2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202270139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macro‐ and Nano‐Porous 3D‐Hierarchical Carbon Lattices for Extraordinarily High Capacitance Supercapacitors (Adv. Funct. Mater. 24/2022)

Abstract: In article number 2201544, Yuto Katsuyama, Richard B. Kaner, and coworkers show that 3D-printed thick supercapacitor electrodes having bimodal porosity (≈20 µm macropores and 2-3 nm nanopores) can significantly enhance the overall cell energy/power densities by eliminating the use of inactive components such as current collectors and separators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These devices also exceed performance of both planar Ti 3 C 2 T x -MXene and other 3D printed lattice electrodes. [21,30] Additionally, comparing the charge transfer resistance (R ct ) at 0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl, we see a similar trend, as shown in Figure 5c. R ct was calculated as the diameter of the semicircle of the Nyquist plots obtained in the frequency range of 100 kHz-0.1 Hz through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement at 0.5 V. As shown in Figure 5c, R ct is higher for the octet and cubic lattices, reaching values of 8.94 and 8.01 Ω respectively, while the BCC lattice exhibits a lower R ct of 6.84 Ω.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of 3d Lattice Electrodessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These devices also exceed performance of both planar Ti 3 C 2 T x -MXene and other 3D printed lattice electrodes. [21,30] Additionally, comparing the charge transfer resistance (R ct ) at 0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl, we see a similar trend, as shown in Figure 5c. R ct was calculated as the diameter of the semicircle of the Nyquist plots obtained in the frequency range of 100 kHz-0.1 Hz through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement at 0.5 V. As shown in Figure 5c, R ct is higher for the octet and cubic lattices, reaching values of 8.94 and 8.01 Ω respectively, while the BCC lattice exhibits a lower R ct of 6.84 Ω.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performance Of 3d Lattice Electrodessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The carbonization process makes the structures conductive while enhancing the resolution, preserving the microstructure of the 3D printed polymers while shrinking them to roughly 38% of their original printed size (see additional images in Figure S1, Supporting Information). Similar processes have been reported for carbonizing 3D printed resins printed by stereolithography using higher temperature anneals (900 °C) in nitrogen or argon, [21,28,29] however, our work achieves up to 7× smaller features while retaining fully solid struts (Figure S2, Supporting Information) and minimizing defects. Even the layers formed during printing, due to the layer-by-layer nature of the μSLA process, are maintained during carbonization, appearing as lines on the structures in Figure 3.…”
Section: Conductivity Of 3d Lattice Structures As a Function Of Relat...supporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ultralong work life and cyclic stability are among the best level of EDLC capacitors and outperform most of the reported COF‐based pseudocapacitors and batteries (Figure 5h). [ 14–17,39,66–74 ] This superior cycling performance demonstrates the outstanding chemical and structural stability of COF NPs, and their strong interface interaction with graphene scaffolds. The capacitive performances of v‐COF‐GAs capacitor cells were compared with other reported supercapacitors in the Ragone plot (Figure 5i and Figure S19, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10,11 ] Therefore, hierarchical pore‐structure engineering that coordinates structural features spanning multiple length scales is crucial for developing high‐performance electrodes. [ 11–14 ] Despite significant progress made in regulating either microscale or macroscale structure, [ 13–18 ] simultaneously tailoring the mesoscale structure to achieve full‐scale engineering of the electrode remains a great challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%