Macro-level environmental comparison of near-dry machining and flood machining

Frăţilă, Domnita

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.017

Cited by 66 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore an LCA analysis is only valid as its data and is highly dependent on the completeness and accuracy of the datasets used. Nevertheless an LCA analysis can be also carried out by including accurate data about the power signature of a process derived from machining experiments (Fratila, 2010).…”

Section: Energy-related Issues In Machiningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the use phase energy requirements of a machine tool system

Avram

Xirouchakis

2011

Journal of Cleaner Production

242

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Energy-related Issues In Machiningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the use phase energy requirements of a machine tool system

Avram

Xirouchakis

2011

Journal of Cleaner Production

242

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…More recently, Anastaselos et al (2011) and Bradley et al (2006) considered environmental impact as a factor in decision support modeling. Research has analyzed process environmental impacts from macro (Fratila, 2010) and micro levels. Several studies have investigated micromanufacturing processes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An economic and environmental assessment model for microchannel device manufacturing: part 1 – Methodology

Gao

Lizarazo-Adarme

Paul

et al. 2016

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Available online xxxKeywords: Bottom-up cost modeling Environmental impact assessment Decision making Microchannel process technology Graphical user interface a b s t r a c tTo manage the effects of manufacturing industries on the economy and environment, design tools are needed that will aid engineers to assess manufacturing costs and environmental impacts early in design. The development of cost analyses and environmental assessments can be burdensome, but much of the data used in these analyses can be shared. Little work has been done to integrate environmental assessments with cost analyses for the purposes of evaluating manufacturing plans for both environmental impact and cost. A spreadsheet-based cost and environmental impact assessment model is developed for simultaneously analyzing the effects of manufacturing process plans on both product cost and the environment. A bottom-up process-based cost calculation method is used to estimate microchannel device manufacturing costs over a range of production volumes, while process-based cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment is utilized to evaluate environmental impacts. Both models draw data from a common database for describing the device geometry and the production environment. The method is used to evaluate the manufacturing plan for a microchannel heat exchanger, providing insight into the likely drivers of cost and environmental impact. For this case study, the analysis shows that both cost and environmental impact are dominated by the same process step e diffusion bonding.

show abstract

“…Also applied is the LCA approach in which the effect of cooling/lubricating method is analyzed more extensively, in a broader way. In Fratila (2010), workpiece material, scrap processing, use of lubrication, and energy consumption are considered. Energy, water and land use, acidification, solid waste and global warming potential in cutting fluid production are studied in Pusavec et al (2010a) and Pusavec et al (2010b), taking into consideration usage amounts, consumption rate and machine tool usage.…”

Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning

confidence: 99%