2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-012-0417-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macro-mechanical modelling of blast wave mitigation in foams. Part I: review of available experiments and models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting conclusions were drawn on the influence of the contact between the foam layer adjacent to the wall and the sensing element of the transducer. In addition, Britan et al [33] presented a review paper in which they summarized the essential features of aqueous-foam barriers against blast waves impact encountered in both shock-tube experiments and full-scale field tests. The modeling aspect of blast/shock waves mitigation was also discussed.…”
Section: Thematic Issue On Sbwmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting conclusions were drawn on the influence of the contact between the foam layer adjacent to the wall and the sensing element of the transducer. In addition, Britan et al [33] presented a review paper in which they summarized the essential features of aqueous-foam barriers against blast waves impact encountered in both shock-tube experiments and full-scale field tests. The modeling aspect of blast/shock waves mitigation was also discussed.…”
Section: Thematic Issue On Sbwmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work some numerical results based on the method of Chinnayya et al [6] are also presented. Finally we refer the reader to the review papers of Britan et al [4] and [5] which appeared recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of the numerous methods that have been investigated to attenuate shock waves, porous structures featuring rigid or flexible granular filters [37] or foams [38,39] made of solid mat erials or liquids demonstrated a great deal of promise [40][41][42][43]. However, detailed mechanisms of shock wave attenuation in these porous structures are not yet completely understood because of their extremely complex features.…”
Section: Polyurethane Foammentioning
confidence: 99%