2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1092246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic Cycles and the Stock Market's Reaction to Monetary Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
101
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
17
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, excluding unscheduled FOMC meetings in Table 3 Panel C, leads to smaller and statistically insignificant estimates of the pre-crisis impact of FFR surprises and major deterioration in the fit of the model. This finding is consistent with previous evidence by Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) and Basistha and Kurov (2008) for the pre-crisis period.…”
Section: Figures 4-5 Here]supporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, excluding unscheduled FOMC meetings in Table 3 Panel C, leads to smaller and statistically insignificant estimates of the pre-crisis impact of FFR surprises and major deterioration in the fit of the model. This finding is consistent with previous evidence by Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) and Basistha and Kurov (2008) for the pre-crisis period.…”
Section: Figures 4-5 Here]supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Previous studies on the US stock market, have widely documented a positive reaction to expansionary monetary policy surprises and state dependence, with the aforementioned reaction being stronger during 'bad times' of negative economic growth and deteriorating financial conditions (see e.g. Basistha and Kurov, 2008;Kurov, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the markets were more sensitive to unexpected movements in the Fed's target rate during the period of rising interest rate cycle. This is consistent with Basistha and Kurov (2008) who report stronger U.S. stock market responses to unexpected rate changes of the Fed during the periods of recessions and tight credit conditions. However, there is no clear evidence for such sample specific market responses to the ECB's news.…”
Section: The Ecb's Target Interest Rate Newssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The response is stronger for smaller stocks, consistent with the "sizeeffect" of monetary policy actions (Thorbecke, 1997;Ehrmann and Fratzscher, 2004;Jansen and Tsai, 2010; Kontonikas and Kostakis, 2013; Maio, 2014). Furthermore, the monetary policy effect on stock prices is found to be stronger during bad economic times and in bear markets (Basistha and Kurov, 2008;Jansen and Tsai, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The response is stronger for smaller stocks, consistent with the "sizeeffect" of monetary policy actions (Thorbecke, 1997;Ehrmann and Fratzscher, 2004;Jansen and Tsai, 2010; Kontonikas and Kostakis, 2013; Maio, 2014). Furthermore, the monetary policy effect on stock prices is found to be stronger during bad economic times and in bear markets (Basistha and Kurov, 2008;Jansen and Tsai, 2010).Most of the existing empirical studies do not directly address the simultaneity problem, which stems from the potential response of monetary policy to stock market developments, and simply focus on the reaction of stock prices to monetary policy shocks. In 4 two influential studies, however, Rigobon and Sack (2003; show that the relationship between the US monetary policy and stock valuation is bi-directional.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%