2012
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2012-20936-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrospin approximation and quantum effects in models for magnetization reversal

Abstract: The thermal activation of magnetization reversal in magnetic nanoparticles is controlled by the anisotropy-energy barrier. Using perturbation theory, exact diagonalization and stability analysis of the ferromagnetic spin-s Heisenberg model with coupling or single-site anisotropy, we study the effects of quantum fluctuations on the height of the energy barrier. Opposed to the classical case, there is no critical anisotropy strength discriminating between reversal via coherent rotation and via nucleation/domain-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= S(S + 1) [39][40][41][42][43]. Indeed, the agreement constantly improves with increasing S, see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…= S(S + 1) [39][40][41][42][43]. Indeed, the agreement constantly improves with increasing S, see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The present study is performed for a single spin, i.e., we consider a classical-spin Kondo-impurity model with antiferromagnetic local exchange coupling J, while the theory itself is general and can be applied to more than a single or even to a large number of spins as well.As compared to the conventional (quantum-spin) Kondo model, [27,28] the model considered here does not account for the Kondo effect and therefore applies to situations where this is absent or less important, such as for systems with large spin quantum numbers S, strongly anisotropic systems or, as considered here, systems in a strong magnetic field. To estimate the quality of the classical-spin approximation a priori is difficult [29][30][31]. For one-dimensional systems, however, a quantitative study is possible by comparing with full quantum calculations and will be discussed elsewhere [32].There are different questions to be addressed: for dimensional reasons, one should expect that linearresponse theory, even for weak J, must break down at long times.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As compared to the conventional (quantum-spin) Kondo model, [27,28] the model considered here does not account for the Kondo effect and therefore applies to situations where this is absent or less important, such as for systems with large spin quantum numbers S, strongly anisotropic systems or, as considered here, systems in a strong magnetic field. To estimate the quality of the classical-spin approximation a priori is difficult [29][30][31]. For one-dimensional systems, however, a quantitative study is possible by comparing with full quantum calculations and will be discussed elsewhere [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This macrospin picture is reasoned by the fact that for the coupled spin chain (or cluster, network) in nanoscale ferromagnets with a singledomain state, spins are tightly coupled and thus form an effective coarse-grained macrospin 28 . Microscopically, the spin chain model with exchange interactions can be derived from the tight-binding electron chain model with strong Coulomb interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central local spin may represent an insulating molecule magnet 26 or a ferromagnetic nanoparticle 27 found in a nanoscale single-domain state and thus is described by the effective macrospin 28 , as:…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%