2012
DOI: 10.3986/9789612546007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magdalenska gora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other barrows in the region, however, were used for several centuries and contain much larger numbers of burials; for example, as many as 400 at Preloge, near Magdalenska gora (Tecco Hvala et al . 2004: 124; Dular & Tecco Hvala 2007: 123–26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other barrows in the region, however, were used for several centuries and contain much larger numbers of burials; for example, as many as 400 at Preloge, near Magdalenska gora (Tecco Hvala et al . 2004: 124; Dular & Tecco Hvala 2007: 123–26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The burials often count in the hundreds, and in the thousands in better-explored cemeteries, which were in continuous use for several centuries and in some cases for well over 500 years. 9 Cremation of the deceased is a prevailing funeral rite, although there are remarkable regional exceptions, as seen in the inhumation burials under large, long-lasting family barrows in the Dolenjska region (Teržan, 2010;Tecco Hvala, 2012).…”
Section: What Was Going On After?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger study of animal imagery on Dolenjska Hallstatt artefacts included many artefacts that are often used to identify gender (e.g., bracelets and beads;Teržan 1985;Tecco Hvala 2012, 376-384), so to avoid circular reasoning a more conservative assemblage of artefacts was used to identify the probable gender of the deceased. Probable males were identified based on the presence of weapons, defensive gear, razors, and whetstones (Teržan 1985;233-245;Tecco Hvala 2012, 137-143, 341), while probable females were identified based on the presence of anklets, textile equipment, earrings, and hair rings (Tecco Hvala 2007;Tecco Hvala 2012, 290, 332-333). In cases where male and female gendered artefacts appeared together in a grave without any indication that it was a multiple burial, gender attribution was marked 'indeterminate'.…”
Section: Distribution Of Ram's Head Beadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teržan 1985;Tecco Hvala 2012, 376-384). V izogib krožnemu sklepanju pri prepoznavanju spola pokopanih oseb se opiram na bolj konservativen sklop predmetov, in sicer na orožje, obrambne oprave, britve in brusne kamne kot verjetne označevalce moškega spola (Teržan 1985;2008, 233-245;Tecco Hvala 2012, 137-143, 341) ter na uhane in lasne obročke, nanožnice in tkalske pripomočke za ženskega (Tecco Hvala 2007;2012, 290, 332-333). V primerih, ko so v grobu pridatki, značilni za moški in ženski spol, ga obravnavam kot dvojni pokop; če ne vsebujejo nobenega pokazatelja spola, pa kot neopredeljenega.…”
Section: žEnske Ovce In Tekstil: Družbeni Pomen Jagod V Obliki Ovnove Glavice V Starejši žElezni Dobi Na Slovenskemunclassified