2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-013-0785-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magma–ice–sediment interactions and the origin of lava/hyaloclastite sequences in the Síða formation, South Iceland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that the sills and debris flow deposits described here were emplaced beneath thick ice, in a similar way to the model of Smellie (2008). This is because the sills appear to have intruded along the base of the ice both prior to and during the debris flows (as they are present both beneath the subsequence, with no alteration of the overlying deposits, and in its lower parts, mostly parallel to the bedding), contradicting the models of Banik et al (2014). Furthermore, it is difficult to reconcile the apparently contemporaneous deposition of the sequence of debris flows as extensively as they are present on Sollipulli with the amount of meltwater that could be generated beneath thin glaciers.…”
Section: Sharkfin Debris Flow Subsequencecontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We suggest that the sills and debris flow deposits described here were emplaced beneath thick ice, in a similar way to the model of Smellie (2008). This is because the sills appear to have intruded along the base of the ice both prior to and during the debris flows (as they are present both beneath the subsequence, with no alteration of the overlying deposits, and in its lower parts, mostly parallel to the bedding), contradicting the models of Banik et al (2014). Furthermore, it is difficult to reconcile the apparently contemporaneous deposition of the sequence of debris flows as extensively as they are present on Sollipulli with the amount of meltwater that could be generated beneath thin glaciers.…”
Section: Sharkfin Debris Flow Subsequencecontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The local occurrence of the lava subsequence above the hyaloclastite suggests that these lavas could have been erupted under ice, but their presence beneath the hyaloclastite subsequence in all locations where its base is exposed indicates that there was a widespread shift to conditions favourable to meltwater ponding, which we consider to be most plausibly explained by glacierisation. Additionally, the ice thickness associated with Dalsheidi-type sequences, which we consider analogous to the Sharkfin debris flow subsequence, has been disputed (Smellie, 2008;Banik et al, 2014). This is discussed in Section 4.1.3, where we suggest that the field evidence is more consistent with the model of emplacement under thick ice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subsurface stratigraphy of Iceland mainly consists in a succession of hyaloclastite formations and lava flows (Weisenberger and Selbekk 2009;Banik et al 2014) sometimes intersected by basalt intrusions (Lonker et al 1993;Mortensen et al 2014). The thickness of individual layers is variable and irregular (Watton et al 2013), varying between a few meters and a few hundred meters (Alfredsson et al 2013).…”
Section: Rock Formationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Banik et al . ). Avoiding the confusion, and for simplicity, we collectively use the term ‘subaqueous bombs’ for fluidal clasts of explosive origin in the Sawasaki pyroclastic rocks (Fig.…”
Section: Sawasaki Basaltmentioning
confidence: 97%