2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic enhancement of carbon-encapsulated magnetite nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the initial sample Fe 3 O 4 @C, M s = 92.8 emu/g which is equal to M s of bulk Fe 3 O 4 samples, 84 emu/g at room temperature [ 14 ], and essential greater than values presented by other authors for Fe 3 O 4 NPs, for example, [ 19 , 21 ]. At the same time, the magnetization increase in the magnetite NPs coated with carbon comparing to uncoated NPs was noted by some authors [ 27 , 28 ]. To explain this enhancement, the authors of Refs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the initial sample Fe 3 O 4 @C, M s = 92.8 emu/g which is equal to M s of bulk Fe 3 O 4 samples, 84 emu/g at room temperature [ 14 ], and essential greater than values presented by other authors for Fe 3 O 4 NPs, for example, [ 19 , 21 ]. At the same time, the magnetization increase in the magnetite NPs coated with carbon comparing to uncoated NPs was noted by some authors [ 27 , 28 ]. To explain this enhancement, the authors of Refs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…To explain this enhancement, the authors of Refs. [ 27 , 28 ] proposed an ionic hypothesis of a polarized charge transfer to the A-site in the Fe 3 O 4 NPs leading to a charge reduction at the A-site (i.e., Fe A 3+ → Fe A 2+ ). Since the resulting magnetization of the sample in Fe 3 O 4 is due to the difference in the magnetic moments of Fe ions occupying octahedral and tetrahedral positions, the redistribution of Fe ions between oppositely magnetized sublattices in magnetite NPs is caused, for example, by technological conditions and can be one of the reasons for the different values of M s .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5–7 ] Indeed, the SWCNT ensures a fine dispersion of magnetic species along the longitudinal axis, thus restricting the magnetic coupling between them and thereby enhancing the inherent properties of nanoparticles. [ 8–11 ] A reduction of intermolecular dipole–dipole interactions between the neighboring encapsulated molecules leading to enhanced magnetic properties was recently demonstrated for single‐molecule magnets. [ 12 ] The 1D arrangement of single‐molecule magnets provides the suppression of quantum tunneling of the magnetization [ 12,13 ] that is crucial for practical applications.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have pointed out the importance of employing a carbon layer since it is (i) practical, (ii) biocompatible, and (iii) would lead to reducing the damage of the magnetic core when exposed to aggressive conditions [17][18][19]. To achieve a proper coating of the magnetic core, a wide range of treatments are available, including chemical vapor deposition, solution plasma processing, hydrothermal methods, spray pyrolysis, and solid-phase synthesis [20][21][22]. It has been demonstrated that IONP encapsulation employing different coatings based on citric acid, lactonic acid, polyvinylpyrrolidone, or polyethylene glycol enhances the chemical, thermal, and colloidal stabilities [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%