1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.6.4151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Field Dependence andQof the Josephson Plasma Resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where f~p = c%/coj and ~bl and ~b2 are the turning points given by the appropriate solutions of E + cos ~bx,z + ~1,2 sin ~bo = 0 (6) and indicated in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Current-bias Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where f~p = c%/coj and ~bl and ~b2 are the turning points given by the appropriate solutions of E + cos ~bx,z + ~1,2 sin ~bo = 0 (6) and indicated in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Current-bias Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2"3 This mode was first observed experimentally by Dahm et al 4'5 Its properties in the small-amplitude limit were found to be in quantitative agreement with theory. Pedersen et al 6 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical. photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BCS theory cannot account for the measured value of the PDC in tunnel junctions [11,12], point contacts [13,14] or weak links [15][16][17]. Several effects may account for such discrepancy (see, e.g., Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them, the famous cos ϕ problem [7,8], puzzled the scientific community for many decades. Various experiments of the time [9][10][11][12][13][14] observed the sign of phase-dependent dissipative current, also known as the "cosine" or quasiparticle-pair interference term, to disagree from the prediction of the MTT [15]. It was later suggested that, in fact, either sign is possible, while the disagreement between the theory and experiments can be explained by broadening mechanisms which result in smearing of the Riedel peaks [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%