1988
DOI: 10.1016/0895-6111(88)90002-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic field strength dependence of chemical shift artifacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted at 3‐T field strength. The spatial shift of chemically shifted perivascular fat at 1.5 T is half of that at 3 T because δf 1.5T ≈ ½δf 3T (38), which leads to ∼1/2 the spatial shift and half the off‐resonance phase accumulation for fat at 1.5 T. Therefore, the chemical shift induced phase error is lower at 1.5 T when spatial resolution and SNR effects are not considered (Fig. 4d,e).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted at 3‐T field strength. The spatial shift of chemically shifted perivascular fat at 1.5 T is half of that at 3 T because δf 1.5T ≈ ½δf 3T (38), which leads to ∼1/2 the spatial shift and half the off‐resonance phase accumulation for fat at 1.5 T. Therefore, the chemical shift induced phase error is lower at 1.5 T when spatial resolution and SNR effects are not considered (Fig. 4d,e).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CSA is caused by the differences in precessional frequency of adjacent proton‐containing substances and increases as field strength increases and gradient steepness and BW decrease (18, 19). It is usually recognized clinically in the frequency‐encoding direction, but occurs in the slice‐selection direction as well (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These non‐EPI trajectories have the advantage that data acquisition time within any one excitation is short relative to the signal decay constant T2* and relative to the time it takes for chemical shift, magnetic susceptibility, and other field distortion artifacts (14–19) to evolve to an easily noticed level. Such artifacts, typically seen as distortions and blurring, are most readily seen across the image space dimension corresponding to the k‐space axis that was most slowly traversed, which in non‐EPI rectilinear trajectories is the readout (x) direction.…”
Section: K‐space Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%