2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.076802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic-Field-Tunable Valley-Contrasting Pseudomagnetic Confinement in Graphene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a real external magnetic field is applied, the total effective magnetic fields in the two valleys become imbalanced and the effective magnetic barriers for quasiparticles in the two valleys are different (figure 5(c)). In this way, the valley-contrasting magnetic barriers are achieved and so is valley contrasting spatial confinement, lifting the valley degeneracy of the confined states [37].…”
Section: Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a real external magnetic field is applied, the total effective magnetic fields in the two valleys become imbalanced and the effective magnetic barriers for quasiparticles in the two valleys are different (figure 5(c)). In this way, the valley-contrasting magnetic barriers are achieved and so is valley contrasting spatial confinement, lifting the valley degeneracy of the confined states [37].…”
Section: Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STS spectra are taken at AA, AB and BA regions and marked in the corresponding areas in the STM image [72] of Fig. 8(c)) [82]. By combining real magnetic fields and PMFs, the total effective magnetic fields in two valleys become imbalanced; the K valley has a higher effective magnetic field, which leads to a shorter effective magnetic con-fined length and a larger energy spacing, and the K valley has a lower magnetic field, resulting in a longer effective magnetic confined length and a smaller energy spacing, thus causing a valley splitting in pseudomagnetic confine- ment regions (bottom panel of Fig.…”
Section: Single-to-periodic Strained Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while a real magnetic field B R splits spin polarised states, a pseudo-magnetic field B s does not split valley polarised states [46]. Some types of strain can be employed to control the valley pseudospin of graphene's carriers [112,[115][116][117][118]. Depicted in figure 5, one method involves the combination of straininduced pseudo-magnetic fields B s and real magnetic fields B R [116,117].…”
Section: Cut and Folded Graphene: Sublattice And Valley Polarisationmentioning
confidence: 99%