1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(97)01010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic force microscopy of thin film media for high density magnetic recording

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
84
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
84
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-domain superparamagnetic magnetite particles have not been studied before with this technique. Previous studies on MFM were focused mainly on magnetic recording media (5) and multidomain magnetic materials (6,7) as well as on tip characterization (8) and image interpretation (9,10). Closer to our work, there were reported the imaging and remagnetization of Co magnetic dots (with lateral dimensions of 140 × 250 nm) (11) and imaging and magnetic moment estimation of magnetotactic bacteria (50 nm in length and 17.5 nm in radius, if modeled as a cylinder) (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Single-domain superparamagnetic magnetite particles have not been studied before with this technique. Previous studies on MFM were focused mainly on magnetic recording media (5) and multidomain magnetic materials (6,7) as well as on tip characterization (8) and image interpretation (9,10). Closer to our work, there were reported the imaging and remagnetization of Co magnetic dots (with lateral dimensions of 140 × 250 nm) (11) and imaging and magnetic moment estimation of magnetotactic bacteria (50 nm in length and 17.5 nm in radius, if modeled as a cylinder) (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This stimulated the measurement of magnetic [7][8][9][10] and electrostatic forces [11][12][13] and led to the development of magnetic force, electric force, and Kelvin probe microscopy [14]. The goal was not so much to understand the force but to image the distribution of magnetization, charge, or surface potential, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All magnetic phase measurements were scanned over a scan area of 2.5 Â 2.5 mm 2 at a lift height of $90 nm to avoid the interference of van der Waals forces or AFM signals (as van der Waals forces are known to be effective only up to a distance of $ 10 nm). [29] Figures 5(a) and 5(b) and 6(a) and (b) show the MFM images (of the top scan of the structures, facing CoFe films) along with their corresponding line scan analysis for CoFe/ p-Si and CoFe/n-Si interfacial structures, respectively. Clear bright and dark contrast has been observed for both the structures.…”
Section: Afm Studymentioning
confidence: 99%