2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19214782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic-Map-Matching-Aided Pedestrian Navigation Using Outlier Mitigation Based on Multiple Sensors and Roughness Weighting

Abstract: This research proposes an algorithm that improves the position accuracy of indoor pedestrian dead reckoning, by compensating the position error with a magnetic field map-matching technique, using multiple magnetic sensors and an outlier mitigation technique based on roughness weighting factors. Since pedestrian dead reckoning using a zero velocity update (ZUPT) does not use position measurements but zero velocity measurements in a stance phase, the position error cannot be compensated, which results in the div… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results suggest that, using a low noise field sensor, the PMHT-MM algorithm is able to use a batch state of small length to yield a robust aided inertial navigation performance without track divergence. • The proposed algorithm may be used for map matching with other types of sensor measurements, such as the gravity gradient tensor (Jekeli, 2006), magnetometer measurements (Kim et al, 2019), or terrain-based navigation (Nygren & Jansson, 2004), etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results suggest that, using a low noise field sensor, the PMHT-MM algorithm is able to use a batch state of small length to yield a robust aided inertial navigation performance without track divergence. • The proposed algorithm may be used for map matching with other types of sensor measurements, such as the gravity gradient tensor (Jekeli, 2006), magnetometer measurements (Kim et al, 2019), or terrain-based navigation (Nygren & Jansson, 2004), etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The proposed algorithm may be used for map matching with other type of sensor measurements, such as the gravity gradient tensor (Jekeli, 2006), magnetometer measurements (Kim et al, 2019), or terrain-based navigation (Nygren & Jansson, 2004),etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of a map-matching algorithm is to map a sequence of observed GPS data to a road segment, providing more accurate and reliable location information for many ITS services such as navigation, map update/inference, object tracking, and traffic prediction [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The HMM is the foundation of map-matching methods as it is capable of handling noisy observations and complex road networks [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional methods define the initial probabilities over states as a uniform distribution and the emission probability distribution based on the distance between the GPS measurements and the closest road segments. Despite wide acceptance in vehicular navigation, HMM-based map-matching methods have not received much attention in pedestrian navigation due to the unique challenges that remain to be overcome [1,2]. The localization error of GPSs in smartphones used by pedestrians is one of the critical factors that limit the large-scale deployment of pedestrian navigation applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%