Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach

Chauhan, Aditya; Vaish, Rahul

doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.021

Cited by 111 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 4, presented the VIKOR papers addressed within Material Selection based on author (s) and year, technique and approach, type of study, application area and scope and study purpose. Liu, Mao, Zhang and Li [78] integrated and proposed the induced aggregation operators into the VIKOR for tackling multiple-criteria problems, Hsu et al [129] integrated VIKOR, DEMATEL and ANP for vendor selection based on recycled materials, Chatterjee et al [130] used the VIKOR method and ELECTRE for material selection, Chauhan and Vaish [131] used the VIKOR method and TOPSIS for magnetic material selection, Çalışkan et al [132] applied VIKOR, PROMETHEE II, AHP, entropy and TOPSIS for material selection, Çalışkan [133] applied the VIKOR method, PROMETHEE II and TOPSIS for material selection. Yazdani and Payam [134] applied the VIKOR method and TOPSIS to develop MEMS technology, Anojkumar et al [135] combined the VIKOR method with fuzzy AHP TOPSIS, ELECTRE and PROMETHEE for selection of pipe material.…”

Section: Construction Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications

Mardani

Zavadskas

Govindan³

et al. 2016

Sustainability

302

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The main objective of this paper is to present a systematic review of the VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method in several application areas such as sustainability and renewable energy. This study reviewed a total of 176 papers, published in 2004 to 2015, from 83 high-ranking journals; most of which were related to Operational Research, Management Sciences, decision making, sustainability and renewable energy and were extracted from the "Web of Science and Scopus" databases. Papers were classified into 15 main application areas. Furthermore, papers were categorized based on the nationalities of authors, dates of publications, techniques and methods, type of studies, the names of the journals and studies purposes. Theresults of this study indicated that more papers on VIKOR technique were published in 2013 than in any other year. In addition, 13 papers were published about sustainability and renewable energy fields. Furthermore, VIKOR and fuzzy VIKOR methods, had the first rank in use. Additionally, the Journal of Expert Systems with Applications was the most significant journal in this study, with 27 publications on the topic. Finally, Taiwan had the first rank from 22 nationalities which used VIKOR technique.

show abstract

Section: Construction Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications

Mardani

Zavadskas

Govindan³

et al. 2016

Sustainability

302

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Amongst those MCDM methods, TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) (Milani et al, 2005; ; Thakker et al, 2008;Rao & Davim, 2008;Rathod & Kanzaria, 2011;Chauhan & Vaish, 2012;Jahan et al, 2012), VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje) and comprehensive VIKOR (Rao, 2008;Chatterjee et al, 2009;Jahan et al, 2011;Girubha & Vinodh, 2012), ELECTRE (elimination and choice expressing the reality) b ; Shanian & Savadogo, 2006 c ; Chatterjee et al, 2009;Cavallini et al, 2013) and PROMETHEE (preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation) (Jiao et al, 2011;Chatterjee & Chakraborty, 2012;Çalışkan et al, 2013;Peng & Xiao, 2013) are the most celebrated ones.…”

Section: Methodology Adoptedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data

Chakraborty¹,

Chatterjee²

2013

10.5267/j.dsl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Selection of material for a specific engineering component, which plays a significant role in its design and proper functioning, is often treated as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem where the most suitable material is to be chosen based on a given set of conflicting criteria. For solving these MCDM problems, the designers do not generally know what should be the optimal number of criteria required for arriving at the best decisive action. Those criteria should be independent to each other and their number should usually limit to seven plus or minus two. In this paper, five material selection problems are solved using three common MCDM techniques to demonstrate the effect of number of criteria on the final rankings of the material alternatives. It is interesting to observe that the choices of the best suited materials solely depend on the criterion having the maximum priority value. It is also found that among the three MCDM methods, the ranking performance of VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje) method is the best.

show abstract

“…A number of studies have given emphasis on material selection by "design-oriented", i.e., by functional demand of a product . For example, Chauhan and Vaish (2012) applied the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods to soft and hard magnetic materials classification and selection [10]. Khare et al (2012) proposed a multi-objective optimization model to identify the most appropriate phase change materials (PCMs) for latent heat storage design [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Commercially Available Materials Selection in Sustainable Design: An Integrated Multi-Attribute Decision Making Approach

Zhao

Chen

et al. 2016

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an integrated multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) approach to aid selection of commercially available materials in the context of sustainable design. The MADM couples grey relational analysis (GRA) with an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to rank alternative materials in terms of their economic, environmental, and social performance. AHP is used to determine the corresponding weighting values for the selected indicators. In addition, a case example is used to verify the proposed MADM method and demonstrate its practical application. Three alternative polymer materials, i.e., poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene (PE), are examined to determine their sustainability for plastic pipe design. The associated MADM result and the limitations of the approach are discussed to lay the foundation for further improvement.

show abstract

Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach

Cited by 111 publications

References 16 publications

VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications

VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications

Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data

Commercially Available Materials Selection in Sustainable Design: An Integrated Multi-Attribute Decision Making Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About