2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic moments in chemically ordered mass-selected CoPt and FePt clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,28,29,37 ). The calculated magnetic moments (M Co = 1.91 µ B , M Pt = 0.40 µ B ) are also in line with previous works 28,29,[38][39][40] . We also note the well-known emergence of an induced moment in Pt, which is due to the hybridization of its 5d orbitals with the exchange splitted 3d orbitals of Co.…”
Section: A Bulk Coptsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…19,28,29,37 ). The calculated magnetic moments (M Co = 1.91 µ B , M Pt = 0.40 µ B ) are also in line with previous works 28,29,[38][39][40] . We also note the well-known emergence of an induced moment in Pt, which is due to the hybridization of its 5d orbitals with the exchange splitted 3d orbitals of Co.…”
Section: A Bulk Coptsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…After annealing, the spin moment is lower and is similar to the value found in the literature for FePt nanoparticles [38,66]. However, m L is surprisingly low compared to previous studies [66,72], including our results on 3 nm FePt nanoparticles embedded in carbon matrix (0.18 µ B /at) [38].…”
Section: Moreover the Particle Shape Is Modeled By Truncated Spheres supporting
confidence: 89%
“…After annealing, the spin moment is lower and is similar to the value found in the literature for FePt nanoparticles [38,66]. However, m L is surprisingly low compared to previous studies [66,72], including our results on 3 nm FePt nanoparticles embedded in carbon matrix (0.18 µ B /at) [38]. m L is very close to the value of L1 0 bulk (0.07 µ B /at [39,71]), which is unexpected, since it is usually assumed that the orbital moment in nano-objects is higher than in bulk due to the broken symmetry.…”
Section: Moreover the Particle Shape Is Modeled By Truncated Spheres supporting
confidence: 88%
“…For iron-containing bi-metallic nanoparticles, the miscibility between iron and carbon has to be considered. In the size range discussed here (2-6 nm diameter) it has been shown for some elemental combinations (FeRh [39], FePt [40]) that even though carbon interstitials may be formed at the interface between metal particle and matrix, this carbide can be decomposed through heat treatment, leading to pure metallic, chemically ordered FePt and FeRh clusters. In other elemental combinations like FeCo a higher chemical affinity for carbide formation is observed and stable iron carbides are detected [41].…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Despite this combination of both properties in the same particle, the iron-silver system in particular does not seem the most adequate candidate system for magneto-plasmonic studies due to the high reactivity of the exposed iron fraction and the resulting reduction of magnetism and the strong phase separation. For other iron-containing nanoparticles, fabricated by the same preparation method (FeRh [39] and FePt [40]), chemically and thermally stable alloy particles have been obtained but here the two metals are miscible in the bulk phase. For iron and gold, with their very limited macroscopic miscibility, a size-induced miscibility was reported in nanoparticles smaller than 10 nm [60] and for different stoichiometries [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%