Abstract:Intra-arterial VEGF gene delivery by magnetic microspheres significantly increased DNA stability, transfection efficiency, and targeting specificity, resulting in exogenous VEGF overexpression and attenuated intimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured artery.
“…Sixteen animal model studies [27-32, 34-42, 45] reported change in arterial lumen post-VEGF modulation. Fourteen studies reported change in neointimal area proliferation (mm 2 ) [27-29, 32-37, 39, 42-45].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 22 studies remained all of which were included in this systematic review (Fig. 1 ; Table 1 ) [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…388 DOI: 10.1159/000527079 which were examined across studies. Twenty studies effectively analyzed decrease or increase of VEGF-A [36,38] or its isoforms (VEGF 121,164,165 ) [27,28,30,31,33,35,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. One of them employed membrane-bound, VEGF receptor 2 expression plasmid (binding site of VEGF-A), effectively increasing the action of VEGF-A [40].…”
Section: Vegf Sub-types or Isoform Examinedmentioning
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Of the 200 million patients worldwide affected by peripheral arterial disease (PAD), 4% will inevitably require major limb amputation. Previous systematic reviews presented a conflicting body of evidence in terms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family member effects upon PAD natural progression. Despite that, modulation of intrinsic angiogenesis mechanisms targeting the VEGF family members still confers an attractive therapeutic target. The aim of the present study was to evaluate current evidence of VEGF modulation in the context of PAD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a systematic literature review conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered under PROSPERO database [CRD42021285988]. Independent literature search was performed up to April 1, 2022, on six databases. A total of 22 eligible studies were identified [N: 3, interventional patient studies; N: 19, animal studies]. Animal studies were appraised by the SYRCLE risk of bias tool, while human participant studies were assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Overall, quality of evidence was deemed fair for both animal and human studies. Main study outcomes were percentage change of injured vessel lumen stenosis and neointimal area formation upon VEGF modulation (inhibition or activation) in comparison with control group. <b><i>Findings:</i></b> Nineteen animal models and three human participant studies were included in the systematic review and assessed separately. Positive modulation of VEGF-A in animal models resulted in a median decrease of 65.58% [95% CI 45.2; 71.87] in lumen stenosis [14 studies]. Furthermore, positive modulation of VEGF-A was found to reduce neointimal area proliferation by a median decrease of 63.41% [95% CI 41.6; 79.59] [14 studies]. Median end of study duration was 28 days [range: 14–84 days]. Data were insufficient to assess these outcomes with respect to VEGF-B or VEGF-C modulation. The limited number of available human studies presented inadequate outcome assessment despite their overall fair NOS grading. <b><i>Interpretation:</i></b> VEGF-A-positive modulation decreases lumen stenosis and neointimal hyperplasia in PAD simulation animal models. Previously identified variability among outcomes was found to strongly stem from the variability of experimental designs. Clinical applicability and safety profile of VEGF-A in the context of PAD remain to be defined by a robust and uniformly designed body of further animal model-based experiments.
“…Sixteen animal model studies [27-32, 34-42, 45] reported change in arterial lumen post-VEGF modulation. Fourteen studies reported change in neointimal area proliferation (mm 2 ) [27-29, 32-37, 39, 42-45].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 22 studies remained all of which were included in this systematic review (Fig. 1 ; Table 1 ) [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…388 DOI: 10.1159/000527079 which were examined across studies. Twenty studies effectively analyzed decrease or increase of VEGF-A [36,38] or its isoforms (VEGF 121,164,165 ) [27,28,30,31,33,35,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. One of them employed membrane-bound, VEGF receptor 2 expression plasmid (binding site of VEGF-A), effectively increasing the action of VEGF-A [40].…”
Section: Vegf Sub-types or Isoform Examinedmentioning
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Of the 200 million patients worldwide affected by peripheral arterial disease (PAD), 4% will inevitably require major limb amputation. Previous systematic reviews presented a conflicting body of evidence in terms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family member effects upon PAD natural progression. Despite that, modulation of intrinsic angiogenesis mechanisms targeting the VEGF family members still confers an attractive therapeutic target. The aim of the present study was to evaluate current evidence of VEGF modulation in the context of PAD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a systematic literature review conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered under PROSPERO database [CRD42021285988]. Independent literature search was performed up to April 1, 2022, on six databases. A total of 22 eligible studies were identified [N: 3, interventional patient studies; N: 19, animal studies]. Animal studies were appraised by the SYRCLE risk of bias tool, while human participant studies were assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Overall, quality of evidence was deemed fair for both animal and human studies. Main study outcomes were percentage change of injured vessel lumen stenosis and neointimal area formation upon VEGF modulation (inhibition or activation) in comparison with control group. <b><i>Findings:</i></b> Nineteen animal models and three human participant studies were included in the systematic review and assessed separately. Positive modulation of VEGF-A in animal models resulted in a median decrease of 65.58% [95% CI 45.2; 71.87] in lumen stenosis [14 studies]. Furthermore, positive modulation of VEGF-A was found to reduce neointimal area proliferation by a median decrease of 63.41% [95% CI 41.6; 79.59] [14 studies]. Median end of study duration was 28 days [range: 14–84 days]. Data were insufficient to assess these outcomes with respect to VEGF-B or VEGF-C modulation. The limited number of available human studies presented inadequate outcome assessment despite their overall fair NOS grading. <b><i>Interpretation:</i></b> VEGF-A-positive modulation decreases lumen stenosis and neointimal hyperplasia in PAD simulation animal models. Previously identified variability among outcomes was found to strongly stem from the variability of experimental designs. Clinical applicability and safety profile of VEGF-A in the context of PAD remain to be defined by a robust and uniformly designed body of further animal model-based experiments.
“…Mature EC or EC progenitor cell transplantation to the injured vessel lumen [27][28][29][30][31] , or accelerating reendothelialization by VEGF or VEGF gene delivery 32,33 , may be promising to combat restenosis after balloon injury or in-stent stenosis. To compare the effect of ECs and arterial flow on vascular remodeling, we seeded HUVECs in the lumen of rat aortas and human umbilical arteries immediately after injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic use of ECs, or elements of their secretome, may be an effective biological approach to treat vascular injuries caused by the aforementioned interventions. In animal models, local delivery of endothelial or endothelial progenitor cells to the injury site [27][28][29][30][31] , injection of intra-arterial VEGF 32 or VEGF gene delivery 33 , all result in reduction of intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in animal models. However, all of these studies employ animal models that are not ideally representative of human physiology.…”
Objective:Invasive coronary interventions can fail due to intimal hyperplasia and restenosis.
Endothelial cell (EC) seeding to the vessel lumen, accelerating re-endothelialization,
or local release of mTOR pathway inhibitors have helped reduce intimal hyperplasia after
vessel injury. While animal models are powerful tools, they are complex and expensive,
and not always reflective of human physiology. Therefore, we developed an in
vitro 3D vascular model validating previous in vivo animal
models and utilizing isolated human arteries to study vascular remodeling after injury.
Approach: We utilized a bioreactor that enables the control of intramural
pressure and shear stress in vessel conduits to investigate the vascular response in
both rat and human arteries to intraluminal injury.Results:Culturing rat aorta segments in vitro, we show that vigorous removal
of luminal ECs results in vessel injury, causing medial proliferation by Day-4 and
neointima formation, with the observation of SCA1+ cells (stem cell
antigen-1) in the intima by Day-7, in the absence of flow. Conversely, when
endothelial-denuded rat aortae and human umbilical arteries were subjected to arterial
shear stress, pre-seeding with human umbilical ECs decreased the number and
proliferation of smooth muscle cell (SMC) significantly in the media of both rat and
human vessels.Conclusion:Our bioreactor system provides a novel platform for correlating ex
vivo findings with vascular outcomes in vivo. The present
in vitro human arterial injury model can be helpful in the study of
EC-SMC interactions and vascular remodeling, by allowing for the separation of
mechanical, cellular, and soluble factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.