2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.11.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic phase diagram for CuMn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) is also observed in the $270-310 K temperature interval presumably caused by a magnetic transition. Gibbs 20 and Chouhan 21 showed in Cu-Mn alloys a transition from paramagnetic to a mixture of spin glass and antiferromagnetic states occurring below 200 K. A similar transition can be assumed in our samples, though the critical temperatures are higher. The structural differences between amorphous thin film and polycrystalline bulk samples can cause this kind of shift.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…5) is also observed in the $270-310 K temperature interval presumably caused by a magnetic transition. Gibbs 20 and Chouhan 21 showed in Cu-Mn alloys a transition from paramagnetic to a mixture of spin glass and antiferromagnetic states occurring below 200 K. A similar transition can be assumed in our samples, though the critical temperatures are higher. The structural differences between amorphous thin film and polycrystalline bulk samples can cause this kind of shift.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, note that the Cu/IrMn interface is surely more complex due to the formation of CuMn spin-glasses. [35][36][37] To conclude, in the context of AF-spintronics, the main contribution of the present study is the determination of FIG. 3.…”
Section: Fig 2 Dependence Of the Resonance Linewidth (Dh Pp )mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We argue that Cu and Mn are indeed miscible and that CuMn alloys are known to lead to spin-glass phases. 11,17,23,24 In order to strengthen our findings and confirm that the effect is predominantly driven by layers intermixing and not by potential structural or roughness changes, we systematically performed measurements for the reversed structures. Figure 2 shows the results for Si/SiO 2 //Ta (3 nm)/Cu (3 nm)/ IrMn (7 nm)/Pt (t Pt )/Cu (t Cu )/Co (3 nm)/Pt (2 nm).…”
Section: A)mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…21) combined with the alternative use of a sufficiently low reference-T recently provided a method for probing the low-T contribution to DT B related to interfacial spin-glass. 12 We expect that inserting a copper/platinum (Cu/Pt) dual barrier between Co and IrMn will fulfil the manifold requirements of limiting the various species intermixing which takes place when using either no or single barriers [4][5][6][7]11,17,[23][24][25] and that this will translate into less glassy interfaces, i.e., into the observation of lower T B dispersions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%