1983
DOI: 10.1029/jb088ib02p01213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic polarity stratigraphy: Stochastic properties of data, sampling problems, and the evaluation of interpretations

Abstract: A statistical model has been derived which can be used either to test the interpretation of a given magnetic stratigraphy or to make time estimates from the paleomagnetic data. The model is based on the presently accepted statistical properties of the earth's magnetic field and the stochastic nature of the paleomagnetic sampling process. Given knowledge of the number of paleomagnetic sites, the distribution of the sites, an estimate of the geologic time span sampled, and the mean length of the magnetic polarit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A statistical assessment of the number of reversals expected (42) given our sampling spacing for the periods 6-14.5 Ma, however, is greater than the actual number of reversals (35) that we detected (Johnson and McGee, 1983). This suggests that we have not recovered the complete magnetostratigraphy.…”
Section: Nrm Characteristics and Magnetostratigraphic Correlationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…A statistical assessment of the number of reversals expected (42) given our sampling spacing for the periods 6-14.5 Ma, however, is greater than the actual number of reversals (35) that we detected (Johnson and McGee, 1983). This suggests that we have not recovered the complete magnetostratigraphy.…”
Section: Nrm Characteristics and Magnetostratigraphic Correlationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…This result suggests that we have recovered more than 95% of the true number of magnetochrons. Additionally, a statistical assessment (Johnson and Mcgee, 1983) of the number of reversals expected with our site density (63) is commensurate with the number of reversals we detected (65). Questionable reversals defi ned by only a single specimen are shown with a half-bar (Fig.…”
Section: Geographicmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Using the statistical method of Johnson and McGee (1983), the amount of time, Δt, represented by a sampled section can be approximated using the formula Δt (m.y.) = SтN, where S = -ln (1 -2p)/2 (т = mean time span of polarity intervals; N = the number of paleomagnetic sites; and p = R/ [N -l], where R is the number of reversals encountered).…”
Section: Magnetic Polarity Zonationmentioning
confidence: 99%