1996
DOI: 10.1021/cm960077f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Properties of Nanostructured Materials

Abstract: Understanding the correlation between magnetic properties and nanostructure involves collaborative efforts between chemists, physicists, and materials scientists to study both fundamental properties and potential applications. This article introduces a classification of nanostructure morphology according to the mechanism responsible for the magnetic properties. The fundamental magnetic properties of interest and the theoretical frameworks developed to model these properties are summarized. Common chemical and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

26
976
4
18

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,635 publications
(1,024 citation statements)
references
References 258 publications
26
976
4
18
Order By: Relevance
“…5͑a͒, which indicates a considerable amount of relaxation within a time period of 7000 s. This curve rules out the possibility of cusp behavior in the ZFC curve due to superparamagnetic behavior as for superparamagnetic systems the relaxation is very fast, within the experimental time scale of hundreds of seconds. 55 Also, the time dependence of the thermoremanent magnetization can be fitted well with a stretched exponential function M͑t͒ = M 0 + M r exp͓−͑t / ͒ 1−n ͔, where M 0 is related to the intrinsic ferromagneticlike component and M r relates to a glassy component contributing to the observed relaxation effect. The time constant and the parameter n are related to the relaxation rate.…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5͑a͒, which indicates a considerable amount of relaxation within a time period of 7000 s. This curve rules out the possibility of cusp behavior in the ZFC curve due to superparamagnetic behavior as for superparamagnetic systems the relaxation is very fast, within the experimental time scale of hundreds of seconds. 55 Also, the time dependence of the thermoremanent magnetization can be fitted well with a stretched exponential function M͑t͒ = M 0 + M r exp͓−͑t / ͒ 1−n ͔, where M 0 is related to the intrinsic ferromagneticlike component and M r relates to a glassy component contributing to the observed relaxation effect. The time constant and the parameter n are related to the relaxation rate.…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For superparamagnetic systems, as is well known, the curves merge into a single one. 43,55 This rules out the possibility of thermal-energyinduced spontaneous magnetization reversal as happens in the case of an assembly of single-domain particles leading to superparamagnetic behavior. More convincingly, the superparamagnetic limit for Fe-doped systems can be calculated by the expression for the relaxation time = 0 exp͑E A V / k B T͒, where the anisotropy energy density E A has a value of 5 ϫ 10 4 J/m 3 for Fe, and V and k B are the particle volume and Boltzmann constant, respectively.…”
Section: Magnetic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…They are constantly undergoing changes to adapt to modern device requirements and, in recent years particularly, magnetic nanostructures have been in the focus of interest, with much attention paid to size and orientation effects. [1][2][3] Many routes to achieving nanoscale materials with different morphologies, including wires, particles, and thin films, to mention only a few, have been reported in the literature. [4][5][6] Among them are solution-processing routes such as solvothermal and sol-gel methods, physical deposition techniques, mechanochemical approaches, and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lengths are predominantly in the order of 1-100 nm (Leslie-Pelecky and Rieke 1996;Holz and Scherer 1994). Here, in this case, the most effective magnetic length is the crystalline anisotropy one which depends mainly on the anisotropy constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%