2001
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging in Multiple Myeloma

Abstract: This article reviews current knowledge on the various lesion patterns that can be observed at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and on computed tomography images in patients with plasma cell neoplasms. It reviews limitations in specificity of imaging features and emphasizes difficulties in the recognition of the benign or malignant origin of vertebral fractures in these patients. The prognostic significance of MR imaging findings with respect to the natural history of the disease or to survival after treatment i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, standard radiography is hampered by a rather low sensitivity, particularly in the assessment of chest and pelvic lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) methods are more sensitive than radiographs (Lecouvet et al, 2001). Because the degree of OBD identified by radiographs is probably underestimated, the correlation between DKK1 expression and the degree of OBD is presumably even higher than we observed, as some of our MM patients with positive DKK1 expression in the 'no' or 'limited' OBD groups might have lytic bone destruction if assessed by CT or MRI.…”
Section: Dkk1contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…However, standard radiography is hampered by a rather low sensitivity, particularly in the assessment of chest and pelvic lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) methods are more sensitive than radiographs (Lecouvet et al, 2001). Because the degree of OBD identified by radiographs is probably underestimated, the correlation between DKK1 expression and the degree of OBD is presumably even higher than we observed, as some of our MM patients with positive DKK1 expression in the 'no' or 'limited' OBD groups might have lytic bone destruction if assessed by CT or MRI.…”
Section: Dkk1contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Therefore, the patients with bone disease can not be precisely distinguished by using the X-rays alone. MRI is superior to plain radiographs in imaging spinal and pelvic lesions, in the differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral fractures, and it has prognostic value in MM [15,16]. Nevertheless, MRI limited to the spine and pelvis can cause lesions at other localizations to be overlooked, and whole-body MRI is too expensive and time-consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Lecouvet MDCT identifies bone destruction in cases where conventional MRI is negative [4]. Conversely, Baur-Melnyk had demonstrated that sensitivity of conventional MRI is superior to MDCT [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%