2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02249-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance and retrograde endoscopic cholangiopancreatography-based identification of biliary tree variants: are there type-related variabilities among the Saudi population?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such findings were also reported in a study of MRCP in 1,011 inhabitants of the Aegean region of Turkey ( 23 ). However, in a study report of 150 Saudi Arabian population, no gender difference was detected ( 24 ). Similarly, in our study, Fisher's accurate test showed no significant correlation between the anatomic variations of the biliary tract and gender ( P > 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such findings were also reported in a study of MRCP in 1,011 inhabitants of the Aegean region of Turkey ( 23 ). However, in a study report of 150 Saudi Arabian population, no gender difference was detected ( 24 ). Similarly, in our study, Fisher's accurate test showed no significant correlation between the anatomic variations of the biliary tract and gender ( P > 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Among the variant types, the right posterior hepatic duct (RPHD) drainage to the LHD (type III) was the most common, noted in about 9.3% to 28.7%. The so-called “trifurcation pattern” (type II) is the second most common, noted in about 9%–19%, and the insertion of the RPHD into the CHD or CD is the least common ( 4 6 , 21 , 23 , 24 ). The Hisense CAS system analysis results showed that type I accounted for 54%, which was the typical biliary anatomical structure, types II and III were the most common variant types, accounting for 10% and 14% respectively, and types IV and V were the least common variant types, accounting for 10% and 2% respectively; these findings were similar to earlier literature reports ( 4 6 , 21 , 23 , 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was variously described as “kinked,” “bassinet‐shaped,” “sharply flexed on itself,” “S‐shaped,” and “double mesial curved” in the earlier literature (Mentzer, 1926). Previous classifications of cystic duct configurations have identified three main types: a normal angular cystic duct (of about 40°, 64%–75%), a spiral type crossing in front of or behind the BD (8%–13%), and a parallel type running parallel to the BD (4%–23%) (Al‐Muhanna et al, 2019; Kubota et al, 1993; Newman & Northup, 1963; Shaw et al, 1993; Turner & Fulcher, 2001). In the present study, the configuration showed many variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the liberal use of pre-operative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is gaining popularity as a roadmap prior to cholecystectomy, aiming to assess primarily for the presence of migrated gallstones within the cystic duct or common bile duct, as well as providing information regarding the anatomical features of the extrahepatic biliary tree on an individualised basis [ 4 6 ]. Although the examination is accompanied by an increase in the healthcare-associated costs, the performance of the pre-operative cholangiopancreatography and its correct interpretation enables, particularly, non-hepatobiliary surgeons to tailor the management of cases with increased complexity, such as patients with Mirizzi’s syndrome, or cases with concurrent extrahepatic bile duct lithiasis that would usually require clearance through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) prior to cholecystectomy [ 7 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%