2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Borasci et al [18] , reported a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative In view of our data, the results of all these studies appear questionable [19][20][21][22][23] . Using MR-Imaging (MRI) in combination with MRcholangiography (MRC) in our study sensitivity of correct diagnosis was highest regarding all indirect techniques.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Borasci et al [18] , reported a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative In view of our data, the results of all these studies appear questionable [19][20][21][22][23] . Using MR-Imaging (MRI) in combination with MRcholangiography (MRC) in our study sensitivity of correct diagnosis was highest regarding all indirect techniques.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Sensitivity and specificity of MR-imaging of post-transplant biliary complications is reported to be high [18][19][20][21][22] . For instance, Borasci et al [18] , reported a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative In view of our data, the results of all these studies appear questionable [19][20][21][22][23] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of limited dilatation of donor ducts further underestimates the diagnosis of strictures on MRCP imaging. Specific criteria have been proposed for diagnosis on MRCP imaging [30] . The variables that need to be studied in MRCP include type of anastomosis, length of stricture, length of common stump proximal to the anastomosis and differential diameters of recipient and donor ducts, etc.…”
Section: Leaks Stricturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other causes include retained stones within the graft or stones formed secondary to bile stasis from biliary strictures. Biliary stones are well depicted with US and MR imaging (Kok et al, 1996;Laghi et al, 1999;Linhares et al, 2004). Interventional procedures may be useful for obviating surgery in these patients .…”
Section: Bile Leakagementioning
confidence: 99%