2015
DOI: 10.1097/mib.0000000000000186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Enterography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, when endoscopic and MRE findings were compared for each intestinal segment, the correlation between SES‐CD score and MaRIA score was relatively weak than that of other segment if the rectum was not properly distended ( ρ = 0.499, p = 0.003) 31 . In addition, MRE cannot detect subtle and very early mucosal erosions and ulcerations, which can only be detected through ileocolonoscopy 38 . In our study, 8.9% (4/45) of patients with TH did not achieve EH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, when endoscopic and MRE findings were compared for each intestinal segment, the correlation between SES‐CD score and MaRIA score was relatively weak than that of other segment if the rectum was not properly distended ( ρ = 0.499, p = 0.003) 31 . In addition, MRE cannot detect subtle and very early mucosal erosions and ulcerations, which can only be detected through ileocolonoscopy 38 . In our study, 8.9% (4/45) of patients with TH did not achieve EH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR enterography can accurately display bowel-wall changes in early CD [51][52][53][54]. Characteristic bowel-wall changes suggesting active inflammation include bowelwall thickening, high T2 mural signal, mural hyper enhancement with mural stratification, and hyperemic vasa recta [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of MR enterography for CD is very good. Rates of sensitivity and specificity are 77% to 82% and 80% to 100%, respectively [24,66,67]; MR enterography can accurately display bowel-wall changes in CD [51][52][53][54]. Characteristic bowel-wall changes suggesting active inflammation include bowel-wall thickening, high T2 mural signal, mural hyper enhancement with mural stratification, and hyperemic vasa recta [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Variant 2: Known Crohn Disease Suspected Acute Exacerbationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians utilize different tests to monitor inflammatory burden and predict relapse in children with IBD. The most accurate methods include endoscopic evaluation, capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance enterography; though, these options are invasive, costly, time consuming and can have associated complications[2-4]. Alternatively, less expensive and less invasive serum biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are also used to monitor inflammatory activity[5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%