2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging after cochlear implants

Abstract: IntroductionMost cochlear implants are currently compatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) up to 3 T. Nevertheless, this does not completely eliminate the risk of serious accidents. Implant displacements and other adverse events with compatible implants have been reported in the literature.Case reportsAmong the six patients who had MRI after receiving implants at our center, we report three cases with adverse events related to the examination. The first case was complicated by magnet displacement with p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the exam could be incomplete. In a previous study, Bawazeer et al reported larger artefacts on DWI and FLASH sequences; intermediate artefacts on T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR sequences; and small artefacts on MRI angiography sequences 4 ; whereas in a human cadaver study Wagner et al found significant improvement of the image quality and diagnostic usefulness both at 1.5 T and 3 T after magnet removal, with residual artefacts masking the peripheral areas of ipsilateral lobes and cerebellum and with strongest artefacts on T1 multiplanar reconstruction and constructive interference in steady state sequences. 5 When looking for contralateral hemisphere changes, removal of the magnet is not mandatory, but the exam should be carried out by following recommendations provided by manufacturer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…and the exam could be incomplete. In a previous study, Bawazeer et al reported larger artefacts on DWI and FLASH sequences; intermediate artefacts on T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR sequences; and small artefacts on MRI angiography sequences 4 ; whereas in a human cadaver study Wagner et al found significant improvement of the image quality and diagnostic usefulness both at 1.5 T and 3 T after magnet removal, with residual artefacts masking the peripheral areas of ipsilateral lobes and cerebellum and with strongest artefacts on T1 multiplanar reconstruction and constructive interference in steady state sequences. 5 When looking for contralateral hemisphere changes, removal of the magnet is not mandatory, but the exam should be carried out by following recommendations provided by manufacturer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There are also possibilities of displacing the magnet in the implant, demagnetizing the implant magnet, and causing pain to the patient during the MRI. Sometimes the pain is very severe and it is impossible complete the MRI examination [8,9,13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, the magnet returns to its original setting by itself after the test, but this does not always happen. Displacement of the magnet can be verified by CT scans or X-rays and sometimes it is necessary to replace the whole implant, requiring surgical intervention [8,9,14,15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of this article was to provide an overview of 10 yr (2008–2017) of FDA adverse event reports for MR systems. While previous studies have looked at adverse events in specific patient populations, particularly those with implanted medical devices (e.g., cochlear implants, pacemakers or defibrillators, breast tissue expanders, magnetically controlled growing rods) or specific imaging studies (e.g., fMRI), our goal was to provide a broad characterization of the types of adverse events that occur in the MR environment. Unlike previous studies, we did not limit our analysis to only thermal or auditory injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%