2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy accurately estimate the severity of steatosis provided the stage of fibrosis is considered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
145
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
145
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar study on cancer patients, the use of MTX led to an increase in ALT in 14% and AST in 8% of patients, although by discontinuing drug use within 1 month, the level of liver enzymes could return to the normal range (21). In the present study, no association was revealed between the grade of steatosis and severity of hepatic fibrosis that was also previously indicated in some studies (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Overall, it could be concluded that FibroScan is a useful technique for assessing hepatic fibrosis in patients, who receive MTX.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In a similar study on cancer patients, the use of MTX led to an increase in ALT in 14% and AST in 8% of patients, although by discontinuing drug use within 1 month, the level of liver enzymes could return to the normal range (21). In the present study, no association was revealed between the grade of steatosis and severity of hepatic fibrosis that was also previously indicated in some studies (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Overall, it could be concluded that FibroScan is a useful technique for assessing hepatic fibrosis in patients, who receive MTX.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Magnetic-resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is the best imaging modality to grade the severity of steatosis with high accuracy [25,26], but it is not broadly available and its routine application is not perceived practical in the pre-transplant setting. On the other hand, US is cheap and easily available, and provides good accuracy for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, but it is operator dependent with low inter-and intra-observer agreement on the severity of steatosis [16,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MOZART study, mean PDFF trended downwards between F0-2 and F2-4 [31,34]. It is known that MRI may underestimate the amount of fat in hepatocytes when compared with histology in those with more advanced fibrosis because the number of hepatocytes per volume of liver is reduced, leading to an apparent reduction in liver fat [37]. Therefore, it is likely that fibrosis stage will need to be considered when measuring steatosis in patients with chronic liver disease [37].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging-proton-derived Fat Fraction (Mri mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that MRI may underestimate the amount of fat in hepatocytes when compared with histology in those with more advanced fibrosis because the number of hepatocytes per volume of liver is reduced, leading to an apparent reduction in liver fat [37]. Therefore, it is likely that fibrosis stage will need to be considered when measuring steatosis in patients with chronic liver disease [37]. Concomitant assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis by MRI may overcome this need [34], as discussed later in this review.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging-proton-derived Fat Fraction (Mri mentioning
confidence: 99%