2018
DOI: 10.1002/mus.26064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 In the last years, the increasingly widespread use of standard and quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in FSHD patients suggested a non-linear model of disease progression that proceeds with a muscle-by-muscle type of involvement, 8 in which an early phase of muscle damage, identifiable by increased signal on short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences accounting for oedema/inflammation, precedes fatty replacement of single muscles. [9][10][11][12] This would be consistent with the proposed model of disease pathophysiology, according to which bursts of inappropriate expression of the DUX4 retrogene, normally repressed in adult striated skeletal muscle, lead to a cascade of downstream events, not yet fully understood but potentially inclusive of an inflammatory-immune response, [13][14][15][16] that in the end generate skeletal muscle wasting. 17 In this context, STIR positive (STIR+) muscle lesions have been proposed as biomarkers of disease activity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…7 In the last years, the increasingly widespread use of standard and quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in FSHD patients suggested a non-linear model of disease progression that proceeds with a muscle-by-muscle type of involvement, 8 in which an early phase of muscle damage, identifiable by increased signal on short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences accounting for oedema/inflammation, precedes fatty replacement of single muscles. [9][10][11][12] This would be consistent with the proposed model of disease pathophysiology, according to which bursts of inappropriate expression of the DUX4 retrogene, normally repressed in adult striated skeletal muscle, lead to a cascade of downstream events, not yet fully understood but potentially inclusive of an inflammatory-immune response, [13][14][15][16] that in the end generate skeletal muscle wasting. 17 In this context, STIR positive (STIR+) muscle lesions have been proposed as biomarkers of disease activity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is important to mention that muscle inflammation in FSHD is described as an intermittent process, affecting specific muscles at any given time [ 40 ]. The presence of active disease in FSHD patients can be radiologically characterized with MRI studies as STIR hyperintensity [ 41 ]. STIR is an MRI dedicated sequence that enables the detection of tissue edema or inflammation [ 42 ] and STIR hyperintensity is a well-known marker of active disease in FSHD patients [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[119] Recently, muscle MRI has also shown its utility in corroborating the diagnosis of FSHD; MRI is more sensitive than physical examination in identifying muscles involved in the disease process and it is able to detect muscle pathology before clinical involvement of muscles. [101,120,121] MRI provides an objective measure of disease progression and can be a helpful endpoint in follow-up and trials in patients with FSHD. [101,122,123] Nevertheless, the current diagnostic approach rests on modalities other than radiological evidence, as shown in Figure 2, and finding a compatible pattern on MRI may serve as corroborative evidence for the diagnosis of FSHD2 in cases of diagnostic uncertainty or an atypical phenotype despite results from investigations highlighted in the algorithm.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%