2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Postsurgical Evaluation of Patients With Mandibular Condyle Fractures Treated Using the Transparotid Approach: Our Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment approach to the mandibular condyle fractures is one of the most widely debated subject in maxillofacial traumatology. [8] Conservative treatment may lead to malocclusion, anterior open-bite, facial asymmetry, internal derangement, chronic joint pain, and reduced mobility. [9] The miniplate osteosynthesis of the subcondylar process using an extraoral approach is currently the most popular method followed by the miniplate osteosynthesis using a transoral approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment approach to the mandibular condyle fractures is one of the most widely debated subject in maxillofacial traumatology. [8] Conservative treatment may lead to malocclusion, anterior open-bite, facial asymmetry, internal derangement, chronic joint pain, and reduced mobility. [9] The miniplate osteosynthesis of the subcondylar process using an extraoral approach is currently the most popular method followed by the miniplate osteosynthesis using a transoral approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As fraturas mandibulares correspondem cerca de 15,5 a 59% das fraturas faciais e podem ser classificadas pelas áreas anatômicas envolvidas: sínfise, corpo, ângulo, ramo, processo condilar, processo coronoide e processo alveolar (Dingman & Natvig, 1964;Olson et al, 1982;Saponaro et al, 2009;Antic et al, 2016). Sendo, as regiões mais acometidas o côndilo (29,1%), o ângulo (24,5%) e a sínfise (22%) (Dingman & Natvig, 1964;Olson et al, 1982;Saponaro et al, 2009;Antic et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified