2004
DOI: 10.1081/ci-200037034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging System Based on Earth's Magnetic Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SQUIDs with untuned input circuits are typically employed [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], because their response is independent of frequency. Low-field images acquired using tuned SQUID pre-amplifiers [33], as well as Faraday detector coils [36,37], have also been reported, though the method of [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] appears to be more efficient. Despite these improvements, insufficiently high SNR remains a major limitation in presentday ULF MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SQUIDs with untuned input circuits are typically employed [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], because their response is independent of frequency. Low-field images acquired using tuned SQUID pre-amplifiers [33], as well as Faraday detector coils [36,37], have also been reported, though the method of [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] appears to be more efficient. Despite these improvements, insufficiently high SNR remains a major limitation in presentday ULF MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors were able to generate images of water-filled tubes and of various fruits, with a slice thickness of ∼ 1 cm and in-plane resolution of ∼ 2 mm. More recently, the same group has published details of an improved Earth's field imaging system, this time using pre-polarisation at 60 mT [12]. Other workers have taken a similar approach, using pre-polarisation prior to signal detection in the Earth's field [13] or even at zero field [14].…”
Section: Earth's Magnetic Field Fc-mrimentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The use of a high-Q receive coil in this instance would result in the frequency-encoded signal outside of the narrow coil response function being attenuated significantly [43,47], possibly to the extent of being unrecoverable via post processing. Thus, we have employed low-Q coils with a high filling factor design to mitigate the issue of finite coil bandwidth at low frequencies [60][61][62]. Lowering the coil Q results in a slight, but inevitable trade-off in image SNR [60,62], however the large signal obtained from hyperpolarized samples allows this to be tolerated to some degree.…”
Section: Hardware Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we have employed low-Q coils with a high filling factor design to mitigate the issue of finite coil bandwidth at low frequencies [60][61][62]. Lowering the coil Q results in a slight, but inevitable trade-off in image SNR [60,62], however the large signal obtained from hyperpolarized samples allows this to be tolerated to some degree. As a result, we have obtained images (Figure 10) with high SNR that do not suffer variable attenuation across the image frequency range due to a convolution of the coil response on the image data, nor non-uniform noise floors (as were observed previously and which required considerable post-processing in order to partly correct the effect [43]).…”
Section: Hardware Performancementioning
confidence: 99%