1970
DOI: 10.1021/ac60287a026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic susceptibility. Aspects of instrumentation and applications including lunar studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reviews of published experimental χ iso values for gases by Foëx and Joussot-Dubien 6 show that there is severe disagreement among authors for the measured χ iso for several gases, even when similar methods and reference fluids are used. Many of these studies certainly suffered from sample contamination, and there are other less obvious sources of errors in the techniques employed . The Foëx review, which covers the literature up to 1956, attempted to identify the most reliable value based on author consensus and reliability of the measurement method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews of published experimental χ iso values for gases by Foëx and Joussot-Dubien 6 show that there is severe disagreement among authors for the measured χ iso for several gases, even when similar methods and reference fluids are used. Many of these studies certainly suffered from sample contamination, and there are other less obvious sources of errors in the techniques employed . The Foëx review, which covers the literature up to 1956, attempted to identify the most reliable value based on author consensus and reliability of the measurement method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well established that magnetometry has proved to be extremely useful in the characterization of these systems at the microand macroscopic levels, dealing with their electronic and bulk structures, analysis of various components present, and so on. The first eleven reviews on "Magnetic Susceptibility" appeared during 1962 to 1982 (39,(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57). This 1984 version covers L. N. Mulay Is a professor of Solid Stale Science In the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the Pennsylvania State University since 1967 and served as chairman of the corresponding interdisciplinary program from 1967 to 1972.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well established that magnetometry has proved to be extremely useful in the characterization of these systems at the micro-and macroscopic levels, dealing with their electronic and bulk structures, analysis of various components present, and so on. The first ten reviews on "Magnetic Susceptibility" appeared during 1962-1980 (91,(102)(103)(104)(105)(106)(107)(108)(109)(110) earlier work. In response to an editorial plea, we have made this review more concise than the previous ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…having been fascinated by the concept of the magnetic monopole (which has been regarded as "fictitious" in most texts) has referred to this concept. He has cited Alvarez and co-workers' experiments on the "hunt for Dirac's monopoles" in the lunar samples, in our earlier reviews (105,106) and in his chapters on "Basic Magnetic Terms and Units" in his books on "Diamagnetism" and "Paramagnetism" (94). A review (with 13 references) on the "Magnetic Monopoles" is written by Olive (119).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%