2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1641511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic versus structural properties of Co nanocluster thin films: A magnetic force microscopy study

Abstract: Magnetic force microscopy ͑MFM͒ has been employed to study thin films consisting of low-energy-deposited cobalt nanoclusters. On continuous cluster layers a clear magnetic stray field pattern can be observed, although measurements on individual clusters are complicated by interference from topography. The magnetic correlation length determined from MFM images is substantially larger than the size of a single cluster. This indicates that the clusters are magnetically coupled to form stable domains associated wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, magnetic stray fields were imaged using magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Briefly we note that magnetic tips had a coating of CoCr with thickness 50 nm and the phase maps were obtained at a lift height from the surface of 40 nm in order to eliminate direct topography effects [8,11,13]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, magnetic stray fields were imaged using magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Briefly we note that magnetic tips had a coating of CoCr with thickness 50 nm and the phase maps were obtained at a lift height from the surface of 40 nm in order to eliminate direct topography effects [8,11,13]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal nanoparticles were produced with a nanoparticle deposition source (http://www.oaresearch.co.uk/nanoparticle.htm) [7] where supersaturated metal vapor is generated by sputtering a metal target in an inert gas atmosphere (at pressures of ∼0.3 to 0.7 mbar) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The sample chamber evacuated to 10 −8 mbar prior to the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations