2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetically guided delivery of DHA and Fe ions for enhanced cancer therapy based on pH-responsive degradation of DHA-loaded Fe 3 O 4 @C@MIL-100(Fe) nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
128
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
6
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[29] Fori nstance,o ur group synthesized amorphous Fe 0 nanoparticles (AFeNPs) (Figure 1a), [25] which were rapidly ionized in an acidic TME to release more Fe 2+ ions than Fe 0 nanocrystals (FeNCs) for CDT because it had the reactive nature of metallic glasses.A sp resented in Figure 1b,c, the release rate of ferrous ions from the AFeNPs reached 57 %at ap Ho f6 .5 and 100 %a tapH of 5.4 within 6h,w hich were much higher than those observed for the FeNCs.M oreover, both AFeNPs and FeNCs tended to slowly release ferrous ions at aneutral pH. These results confirmed the capacity of AFeNPs for selective ferrous ion release,t hus ensuring the efficiency of CDT.I na ddition, many other iron-based nanomaterials,i ncluding Fe oxides, [30][31][32] [FeO(OH) n ], [33] and M(Sn,Mn)Fe 2 O 4 [34,35] have also been introduced as CDT agents,b ut none have focused on increasing the release of the catalytic Fe 2+ ions.…”
Section: Iron-based Inorganic Nanomaterialssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…[29] Fori nstance,o ur group synthesized amorphous Fe 0 nanoparticles (AFeNPs) (Figure 1a), [25] which were rapidly ionized in an acidic TME to release more Fe 2+ ions than Fe 0 nanocrystals (FeNCs) for CDT because it had the reactive nature of metallic glasses.A sp resented in Figure 1b,c, the release rate of ferrous ions from the AFeNPs reached 57 %at ap Ho f6 .5 and 100 %a tapH of 5.4 within 6h,w hich were much higher than those observed for the FeNCs.M oreover, both AFeNPs and FeNCs tended to slowly release ferrous ions at aneutral pH. These results confirmed the capacity of AFeNPs for selective ferrous ion release,t hus ensuring the efficiency of CDT.I na ddition, many other iron-based nanomaterials,i ncluding Fe oxides, [30][31][32] [FeO(OH) n ], [33] and M(Sn,Mn)Fe 2 O 4 [34,35] have also been introduced as CDT agents,b ut none have focused on increasing the release of the catalytic Fe 2+ ions.…”
Section: Iron-based Inorganic Nanomaterialssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…have been used to carry small‐molecule theranostic agents. [ 20,31–34 ] Moreover, porphyrin‐based MOFs have been widely used as NTAs for fluorescence imaging and PDT in tumor therapy. [ 28,35–38 ] Compared to small‐molecule theranostic agents, NTAs composed of MOF nanomaterials demonstrate stronger tumor retention with an enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting study for the multifunctional magnetic core–shell MOF theranostic platform was reported by Chen and co‐workers . Multifunctional Fe 3 O 4 @C@MIL‐100(Fe) (FCM) nanocomposites were designed for simultaneous delivery of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and Fe (III) as cancer theranostic nanoplatforms ( Figure a).…”
Section: Multifunctional Mofs For Cancer Theranosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) The anticancer mechanism of the DHA delivery system. Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2016 Elsevier Ltd.…”
Section: Multifunctional Mofs For Cancer Theranosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%