2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-56371-2.00003-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoelasticity of bcc Fe–Ga Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the aged sample has stronger magnetocrystalline anisotropy than the solution-treated one, as the saturation field and magnetostriction hysteresis are larger than those for the latter. According to earlier studies1422233031, bcc (A2, B2, and DO 3 )-structured Fe–Ga alloys have positive magnetostriction, but the fcc (L1 2 )-structured Fe–Ga alloys have negative magnetostriction. The positive magnetostriction is consistent with these studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the aged sample has stronger magnetocrystalline anisotropy than the solution-treated one, as the saturation field and magnetostriction hysteresis are larger than those for the latter. According to earlier studies1422233031, bcc (A2, B2, and DO 3 )-structured Fe–Ga alloys have positive magnetostriction, but the fcc (L1 2 )-structured Fe–Ga alloys have negative magnetostriction. The positive magnetostriction is consistent with these studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The slight magnetization reduction in Fig. 1 at temperatures close to 880 K is due to the thermal-related ordering loss for the fcc phase, whose T C is predicted as high as α -Fe, ∼1,042 K (refs 2, 14). However, the ferromagnetic fcc→paramagnetic hcp transformation disrupts completely magnetic ordering before its T C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This asymmetry cannot be interpreted as an unresolved tetragonal splitting since the neutron data would imply that c/a > 1, whereas, the x-ray data (with tail to the high-Q side) would imply c/a < 1. Rather, the peak asymmetry is consistent with size-effect scattering 15 where the asymmetry arises from displacements of atoms from their nominal positions in the alloy due mainly to differences in ionic radii of Fe and Ga. The size-effect scattering is proportional to f Ga − f Fe , the difference in the scattering amplitude of Ga and Fe.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…A major goal of the interdisciplinary research of Galfenol is to further enhance their magnetostrictive coefficients for robust performance in devices678. The abrupt drop of magnetostriction of Galfenol, at x = 17 for slow-cooled (10°C/min) samples or x = 19 for quenched samples, was typically attributed to the development of short- and medium-range orderings of Ga atoms at high Ga concentration in the bcc Fe lattice151617.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%