2015
DOI: 10.1130/g36258.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetotelluric images of magma distribution beneath Volcán Uturuncu, Bolivia: Implications for magma dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
123
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They show that the high electrical conductivity (~1 S m -1 ) of the APMB, while maintaining the low melt fractions defined seismically (Ward et al, 2014), can be matched by andesitic melts with high water contents (7-10 wt%). Note that an alternative scenario, wherein the APMB contains dacite melt containing the observed dissolved water content of ≤4 wt%, cannot explain the high electrical conductivity of the APMB as imaged by Comeau et al (2015). To do so, a substantially higher (by at least a factor of 1.5) melt fraction compared to the seismically constrained fraction would be needed (Ward et al, 2014).…”
Section: Petrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They show that the high electrical conductivity (~1 S m -1 ) of the APMB, while maintaining the low melt fractions defined seismically (Ward et al, 2014), can be matched by andesitic melts with high water contents (7-10 wt%). Note that an alternative scenario, wherein the APMB contains dacite melt containing the observed dissolved water content of ≤4 wt%, cannot explain the high electrical conductivity of the APMB as imaged by Comeau et al (2015). To do so, a substantially higher (by at least a factor of 1.5) melt fraction compared to the seismically constrained fraction would be needed (Ward et al, 2014).…”
Section: Petrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andesitic and basaltic andesitic enclaves in Uturuncu lavas and in silicic ignimbrites of the APVC (Michelfelder et al, 2014) are interpreted as aliquots of the least evolved resident magmas in the APMB entrained into the volumetrically dominant, silica-rich dacite magmas (Sparks et al, 2008). The mafic magmas have less radiogenic strontium and more radiogenic neodymium isotopes than associated dacites (Michelfelder et al, 2014) and are thought to be Size and geometry of anomalous structures Schilling et al (2006); Comeau et al (2015Comeau et al ( , 2016 Gravimetry A pproximately 12-24 km wide, vertically elongated (8-12 km high), low-density structures rooted at the top of the APMB at ~15 km below sea level Surface velocity and spatiotemporal evolution of deformation Fialko and Pearse (2012); Henderson and Pritchard (2013);del Potro et al (2013a); Blewitt et al (2016) Geomorphology Absence of sustained residual long-term deformation Null result for residual ground deformation at time, t > 100 yr Perkins et al (2016) Note: See text for details on numerical model. APMB-Altiplano-Puna magma body.…”
Section: Petrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of enormous dimensions and has recently been detected further south as well (Comeau et al 2013). All geophysical data hint at widespread melting, including a low-velocity zone as inferred from seismic tomography (Heit et al 2008).…”
Section: Altiplanomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 2 Ma ago the volcanic activity decreased in magnitude and the eruptive style shifted to smaller and more effusive eruptions (e.g., De Silva and Gosnold, 2007;Salisbury et al, 2011). At a much larger, whole crustal scale, the APVC structure has been studied from a geophysical point of view by seismic tomography and receiver functions (e.g., Chmielowski et al, 1999;Zandt et al, 2003;Ward et al, 2014), electromagnetic methods (Schilling et al, 2006;Comeau et al, 2015), and gravity (e.g., Götze and Krause, 2002;Tassara et al, 2006;Riller et al, 2006;Del Potro et al, 2013). These studies show either the possible presence of magma body about 17 km below the surface (APMB, Altiplano Puna Magma Body) and an upper crust of felsic composition.…”
Section: Geological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%