2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009gl040016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetotelluric transect across the Niigata‐Kobe Tectonic Zone, central Japan: A clear correlation between strain accumulation and resistivity structure

Abstract: We obtained an electrical transect image of the Niigata‐Kobe Tectonic Zone (NKTZ). Several major active faults are located in this zone of concentrated deformation. The main features of the final two‐dimensional model are a thick resistive block in the upper crust, with a thinned‐out portion beneath the Atotsugawa Fault, and a strong conductor in the lower crust that intrudes upward into the upper resistor. The upper crustal resistive zone corresponds well to the spatiality of the NKTZ, and relatively conducti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept is similar to the hypothesis of Iio et al (2002) who assumed that the lower crust had a deformable weak zone. In addition, our results suggest that fluids supplied from conductive zones to nearby resistive zones can promote earthquake occurrences (e.g., Mitsuhata et al 2001;Ogawa et al 2001;Yoshimura et al (Yamashina and Murai 1975) are also overlain on the profiles. Because the hypocentral depths of these two earthquakes were not determined, they are plotted on both profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept is similar to the hypothesis of Iio et al (2002) who assumed that the lower crust had a deformable weak zone. In addition, our results suggest that fluids supplied from conductive zones to nearby resistive zones can promote earthquake occurrences (e.g., Mitsuhata et al 2001;Ogawa et al 2001;Yoshimura et al (Yamashina and Murai 1975) are also overlain on the profiles. Because the hypocentral depths of these two earthquakes were not determined, they are plotted on both profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Such complex tectonic settings suggest complex subsurface structures that may be related to the characteristic seismicity. Because electrical resistivity is sensitive to the presence of fluids, and subsequently the elasticity of the media, it is important to investigate how resistivity structures relate to earthquake generation Fujinawa et al 2002;Goto et al 2005;Guerer and Bayrak 2007;Wannamaker et al 2009;Yoshimura et al 2009;Ichihara et al 2011Ichihara et al , 2014Ichihara et al , 2016Ogawa et al 2014;Kaya et al 2013). To investigate the relationship between earthquakes and electrical resistivity structure, we gathered and analyzed the broadband (typically 0.003-10,000 s) magnetotelluric (MT) and telluric data, which resolve the resistivity structure from the surface to the depth of the upper mantle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, heterogeneous structures beneath intraplate strike-slip faults observed by seismic tomography (e.g., Nakajima and Hasegawa 2007;Nakajima et al 2010) and magnetotelluric survey (e.g., Ogawa and Honkura 2004;Yoshimura et al 2009) suggest the existence of localized weak zones in the lower crust just below intraplate active faults (Iio et al 2002(Iio et al , 2004. The spatial resolution of these observations is insufficient to resolve the structures of such ductile shear zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This value corresponds to the high strain rate in the NKTZ defined by Sagiya et al (2000), and its area seems plausible to the extent of the low seismic velocity anomaly in the lower crust (25 km depth) estimated by Nakajima & Hasegawa (2007). Yoshimura et al (2009) also indicate the extent of the NKTZ, which is located between the Ushikubi fault and the Takayama-Oppara fault zone by the MT analysis. Therefore, the high strain rate zone is identified as this approximately 50 km wide region in this area.…”
Section: Features Of the High Strain Rate Zonementioning
confidence: 96%