2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude–frequency characteristics and preparatory factors for spatial debris-slide distribution in the northern Faroe Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They further noted that in the Tinalah watershed, for instance, the landslide occurrence coincides mostly with an elevation of higher than 400 m.a.s.l., a slope of 20 o , an east-to-west slope direction, and a flat curvature. However, according to Dahl et al (2011) discriminant function analysis shows that preparatory factors responsible for spatial debris-slide distribution are aspect, slope angle, stream density, plan curvature and altitude, while influence of lithology, dip, profile curvature and differences in infield/outfield areas are negligible. Thus, overall there is still lack of consensus on the topographic factors underpinning landslide distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They further noted that in the Tinalah watershed, for instance, the landslide occurrence coincides mostly with an elevation of higher than 400 m.a.s.l., a slope of 20 o , an east-to-west slope direction, and a flat curvature. However, according to Dahl et al (2011) discriminant function analysis shows that preparatory factors responsible for spatial debris-slide distribution are aspect, slope angle, stream density, plan curvature and altitude, while influence of lithology, dip, profile curvature and differences in infield/outfield areas are negligible. Thus, overall there is still lack of consensus on the topographic factors underpinning landslide distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Achieving sustainable sheep grazing regimes is particularly important in mountainous areas, where steep slopes, thin soils and the slow rate of biological processes limit resilience to grazing and trampling. Studies have shown that erosion events correlate with high-intensity grazing in the Faroe Islands (higher altitudes) (Dahl et al 2013), Greenland (mainly one site) (Massa et al 2012) and most notably on Iceland, where erosion of varying severity has been recorded on 70 % of the land area and, although erosion is reported to have decreased, some degraded areas are still grazed (Arnalds 2015;Arnalds and Barkarson 2003). The condition of some parts of the summer grazing land in Iceland has improved considerably in recent years; however, due to lower densities of sheep, shorter grazing seasons and a warmer climate (Thórhallsdóttir 2003), this is still a serious problem in other parts, especially within the volcanic active zone (OECD 2014).…”
Section: Ecosystem Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further noted that in the Tinalah watershed, for instance, the landslide occurrence coincides mostly with an elevation of higher than 400 m.a.s.l., a slope of 20 o , an east-to-west slope direction, and a flat curvature. However, according to Dahl et al (2011) discriminant function analysis shows that preparatory factors responsible for spatial debrisslide distribution are aspect, slope angle, sheep density, plan curvature and altitude, while influence of lithology, dip, profile curvature and differences in infield/outfield areas are negligible. Fernandes et al (2004) and Broothaert et al (2012) among others have also noted the role of investigating topographic influence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%