2016
DOI: 10.1134/s0001433816090279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Main results of recent investigations into the physical mechanisms of the interaction of tropical cyclones and the ionosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, examining lightning rates from the World‐Wide Lightning Location Network (http://webflash.ess.washington.edu/), we find that the rain bands do generate lightning but not at rates that approach those of thunderstorms. We conclude, therefore, that the most likely mechanism of lower ionospheric modification is via GWs as period of detected WLS events is in better agreement with periods of GWs reported in previous studies [e.g., Dhaka et al , ; Vanina‐Dart and Sharkov , ; Song et al , ] than with periods of AWs. The GWs associated with mesoscale convective systems (MCS) within TC become increasingly dominant with altitude having wide range of horizontal scales, from mesoscale to thousands of kilometers [ Lu et al ., 2014], supported by duration of signal perturbation that is more than 2 h for all three simulated VLF anomaly events in our study which is too long as compared to duration of early VLF perturbation events generated by single lighting or TLE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, examining lightning rates from the World‐Wide Lightning Location Network (http://webflash.ess.washington.edu/), we find that the rain bands do generate lightning but not at rates that approach those of thunderstorms. We conclude, therefore, that the most likely mechanism of lower ionospheric modification is via GWs as period of detected WLS events is in better agreement with periods of GWs reported in previous studies [e.g., Dhaka et al , ; Vanina‐Dart and Sharkov , ; Song et al , ] than with periods of AWs. The GWs associated with mesoscale convective systems (MCS) within TC become increasingly dominant with altitude having wide range of horizontal scales, from mesoscale to thousands of kilometers [ Lu et al ., 2014], supported by duration of signal perturbation that is more than 2 h for all three simulated VLF anomaly events in our study which is too long as compared to duration of early VLF perturbation events generated by single lighting or TLE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Some recent experimental studies show that cyclones generate a wide spectrum of GWs in the lower stratosphere as detected in (MU) middle and upper atmosphere radar data [ Dhaka et al , ] and by combining data from GPS occultation and atmospheric sounding balloons with numerical weather models and simulations [ Ming et al , ], and a few studies suggest that disturbances may be induced in the F region of the ionosphere, observed in radar data [ Xiao et al , ] and GPS data [ Perevalova and Ishin , ]. Recent studies include Song et al [] that report medium‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances with period 40–57 min excited during landfall of typhoons Rammasum and Matmo, detected in the total electron content data from a GPS network in China, and Vanina‐Dart and Sharkov [] who conclude that internal GWs associated with cyclones are the main source that affects the tropical ionosphere from below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionospheric disturbances observed above the Hong Kong region on 23 August 2017 had a close link with the Super Typhoon Hato. During the TC period, the strong atmospheric convection at lower altitude formed a regional spiral system, which sequentially generated AGWs (Chou et al., 2017; Nolan & Zhang, 2017; Vanina‐Dart & Sharkov, 2016). The energy of AGWs was substantially strengthened when the TC made landfall over the coast most likely due to its interaction with rough terrain (Kong et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, MSTIDs were observed during the TC periods, for example, Super Typhoon Meranti in 2016 (Chou et al., 2017), Super Typhoon Chan‐hom in 2015 (Song et al., 2019), and Super Typhoon Rammasun and Severe Tropical Storm Matmo in 2014 (Song et al., 2017). The current understanding of the coupling of TCs and ionospheric disturbances is that TCs generated the atmospheric (or acoustic) gravity waves (AGWs), which propagate upward into the ionosphere layer and trigger the ionospheric irregularities (Kong et al., 2017; Vanina‐Dart & Sharkov, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionospheric responses to severe weather events can be explained as that the acoustic gravity waves (AGWs) are generated by the powerful convection during severe weather events. Then, the AGWs propagate up to the ionospheric altitude, leading to anomalous electron density variation (Xiao et al 2007;Perevalova and Ishin 2011;Vanina-Dart and Sharkov 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%