Maintaining union voice in the Australian university sector: Union strategy and non-union forms of employee participation

Abstract

In 2005, Australian universities were required by a federal government, well known for its hostility to unions, to develop representative forms of employee consultation. This requirement posed a considerable threat to union voice in the sector. The article examines the union response to this situation. Our findings suggest that in the short term, the unions adopted a strategy of compliance with this requirement through support for the development of hybrid forms of voice, such as staff consultative committees. The unions then sought to dominate these committees by ensuring that union members were elected as staff representatives, thereby safeguarding the dominance of union voice. The non-union employee representation that was created, however, was constrained as an expression of employee voice. The findings are consistent with Anglo-Saxon literature focusing on the union substitution role of non-union forms of employee representation. There are also resonances in the union strategy with European trends for complementary relations between unions and union-dominated forms of non-union employee representation. However, while our study confirms the importance of the role of the state in determining the structure of non-union employee representation, it departs from the literature in demonstrating an instance where union substitution was sought by the state rather than by management.

Worker participation in union activities: a conceptual review

“…However, such varied deductive inferences do not imply that union-voice interpretation is without validity. As Barnes et al (2013) correctly pointed out: “union forms of employee representation may allow employees to express dissatisfaction with the workplace free from the fear of employer relation, and workers may have the ability to express voice over a wide range of issues, particularly when they lack any legislative definition of powers” (p. 568). As unions are able to provide more breadth through the voice mechanism, their presence could as well improve job satisfaction and allegiance to the organization (Cox et al , 2006).…”

Reducing carbon emissions through employee participation: evidence from Australia

“…Our data indicate that dedicated JCCs and dedicated green representatives were particularly prevalent in the education and training and wholesale trade sectors. While we do not have direct evidence on JCCs in the wholesale sector in Australia, there is evidence that use of JCCs within Australia's university sector has been relatively effective in facilitating union and employee voice (Barnes et al ., ). This may indicate that more effective general JCCs facilitate the creation of dedicated representative mechanisms.…”

The Relationship between Psychological Safety and Employee Voice: The Mediation Role of Affective Commitment and Intrinsic Motivation

“…Significantly, with the exception of the work of Barnes et al, (2013), there is little research on employee voice behavior in the universities. We specifically conducted our research in universities.…”