2002
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance and Manipulation in Spatial Working Memory: Dissociations in the Prefrontal Cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
109
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent findings were observed in the second task, a parametric probe of spatial working memory capacity (SCAP) (32). NF1 individuals showed significantly lower accuracy relative to controls overall (P = 0.03; Fig.…”
Section: Nf1supporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent findings were observed in the second task, a parametric probe of spatial working memory capacity (SCAP) (32). NF1 individuals showed significantly lower accuracy relative to controls overall (P = 0.03; Fig.…”
Section: Nf1supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Study participants performed two spatial delayed response tasks, one contrasting maintenance and manipulation of spatial memoranda consisting of arrays of three dots [stMNM (32,33)] and the other assessing parametrically increasing memory loads [SCAP (33)] consisting of arrays of increasing numbers of dots. Behavioral data were analyzed in SPSS, using repeated measures ANOVA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a computerized version of the SWM task (Sternberg, 1966;Glahn et al, 2002) to assess encoding and maintenance of WM (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In younger adults, activation of the WM network is affected by memory load (23)(24)(25)(26). The load-dependent change of the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal can be characterized as a dose-response function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%