2019
DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2019.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major affective distress in testing forensic paternity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used particular testing timesthe middle of each trimester, as we wanted to identify the particular effect of each of these. More, an earlier test, in the first trimester, and a later one, in the third trimester could have been associate with a small number of participants and with a higher psychological change [15,[36][37][38].…”
Section: Inferential Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used particular testing timesthe middle of each trimester, as we wanted to identify the particular effect of each of these. More, an earlier test, in the first trimester, and a later one, in the third trimester could have been associate with a small number of participants and with a higher psychological change [15,[36][37][38].…”
Section: Inferential Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…"Mood swings" are reported, during pregnancy, mostly in the first and third trimesters [20,21]. This might be explained as most hormonal and anatomical changes occur in the first and third trimesters [14][15][16]. The psychological effect of a real "hormonal flood" during pregnancy was previously addressed [17][18][19].…”
Section: Inferential Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when silver nanoparticles were added to polymers at concentrations of 0.05-0.70%, they were shown to have no cytotoxic effects on human cells. Experimental studies have used doses of Silver nanoparticles ranging from 0.08 to 0.10% mass fraction [23,29,30]. They are deficient concentrations compared to a 10% concentration that may cause cytotoxicity in human cells.…”
Section: Visit Toxicology and Potential Biological Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the scores obtained after applying the scale, people were divided into five categories: very low level of distress (≤28), low level of distress (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39), medium level of distress (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56), high level of distress (57-86), and very high level of distress (≥87).…”
Section: Affective Distress Profile (Pda)mentioning
confidence: 99%