2006
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069x-5-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major congenital malformations and residential proximity to a regional industrial park including a national toxic waste site: An ecological study

Abstract: BackgroundPublic concern about exposure to emissions from the regional industrial park (IP), including 17 chemical plants and the national industrial toxic waste site, initiated this study of the possible association between major congenital malformations (MCM) and residence near the IP in Israel's Southern District.MethodsThe study was conducted during the period 1995–2000 and included 63,850 deliveries. Data on deliveries and MCM detected at births were obtained from the regional medical center, and stratifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LBW; LBW, Stillbirths Landfill site Mother exposure defined as residential postcodes within 2 km buffer zone around each siteYear of birth, sex deprivationModel prediction from poisson regressionNo statistically significant excess risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes (LBW, stillbirth, Congenital anomalies) detected in population living within 2 km of a hazardous waste siteCresswell et al 2003 [24]Ecologic study in city of New Castle upon Tyne, 85–99United Kingdom Specific defects Chromosomal and non-chromosomal defects Waste combustion plant Mother’s exposure defined as residence within 3 km of Byker waste combustion plantED-level deprivationNot able to adjust for other characteristicsPoisson regressions used to estimate Rate ratios for congenital anomalyLittle evidence of relation between prevalence of congenital malformations and residence near waste combustion plantKloppenbor et al 2005 [26]Ecological study in Denmark, 1997–2001DenmarkAll congenital anomalies combined Specific defects The nervous or cardiovascular systems in live births Landfill Three buffer zones: 0–2 (proximal zone), 2–4 (middle zone), and 4–6 km (distal zone) was constructed surrounding waste landfill sitesThe risk rate (RR) was calculated by dividing the sum of congenital anomaly (or specific defects) by total proximal sum of birthsNo association found between maternal residential proximity to landfills and all congenital malformations combined or of the nervous system. However, the result noted small excess risk for anomalies of the cardiovascular systemBentov et al 2006 [57]Ecologic study of live births and stillbirthsBeer-Sheva subdistrict1995–2000 IsraelMajor congenital malformations combined Specific defects Central nervous system, chromosomal anomalies and other major congenital malformations Industrial park Distance of localities from regional industrial park and predominant wind directionCalculation of rateby dividing the number of newborns born with birth defect by the number of deliveriesResidential proximity to industrial park associated with increased rates of major congenital malformations among Bedouin populationsJarup et al 2007 a [49]Ecologic study of England and Wales 1989–1998Great Britain Specific defects Down syndrome Landfill site Mother exposure defined as an residential address within 2-km zone of a landfill siteMaternal ageUrban–rural status, Carstairs’ index of deprivationRegressionmodelling within a Bayesian framework…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…LBW; LBW, Stillbirths Landfill site Mother exposure defined as residential postcodes within 2 km buffer zone around each siteYear of birth, sex deprivationModel prediction from poisson regressionNo statistically significant excess risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes (LBW, stillbirth, Congenital anomalies) detected in population living within 2 km of a hazardous waste siteCresswell et al 2003 [24]Ecologic study in city of New Castle upon Tyne, 85–99United Kingdom Specific defects Chromosomal and non-chromosomal defects Waste combustion plant Mother’s exposure defined as residence within 3 km of Byker waste combustion plantED-level deprivationNot able to adjust for other characteristicsPoisson regressions used to estimate Rate ratios for congenital anomalyLittle evidence of relation between prevalence of congenital malformations and residence near waste combustion plantKloppenbor et al 2005 [26]Ecological study in Denmark, 1997–2001DenmarkAll congenital anomalies combined Specific defects The nervous or cardiovascular systems in live births Landfill Three buffer zones: 0–2 (proximal zone), 2–4 (middle zone), and 4–6 km (distal zone) was constructed surrounding waste landfill sitesThe risk rate (RR) was calculated by dividing the sum of congenital anomaly (or specific defects) by total proximal sum of birthsNo association found between maternal residential proximity to landfills and all congenital malformations combined or of the nervous system. However, the result noted small excess risk for anomalies of the cardiovascular systemBentov et al 2006 [57]Ecologic study of live births and stillbirthsBeer-Sheva subdistrict1995–2000 IsraelMajor congenital malformations combined Specific defects Central nervous system, chromosomal anomalies and other major congenital malformations Industrial park Distance of localities from regional industrial park and predominant wind directionCalculation of rateby dividing the number of newborns born with birth defect by the number of deliveriesResidential proximity to industrial park associated with increased rates of major congenital malformations among Bedouin populationsJarup et al 2007 a [49]Ecologic study of England and Wales 1989–1998Great Britain Specific defects Down syndrome Landfill site Mother exposure defined as an residential address within 2-km zone of a landfill siteMaternal ageUrban–rural status, Carstairs’ index of deprivationRegressionmodelling within a Bayesian framework…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category, in number, is congenital malformations, encompassing studies of all congenital abnormalities combined [1, 1113, 21–26, 3039, 41, 4548, 50, 52, 55, 57], specific abnormalities such as heart defects [1, 1113, 22, 23, 26, 31, 3436, 4547, 52, 55], neural tube defects (NTD) [1, 11, 12, 35, 39, 45, 47, 52, 55], central nervous system abnormalities [12, 23, 26, 3638, 52, 57], oral defects [11, 12, 23, 35, 37, 41, 45, 47, 52], chromosomal abnormalities [12, 13, 24, 33, 34, 37, 46, 4951, 55, 57] and lethal congenital abnormalities [4244, 56]. The second most investigated category of outcome encompassed low birth weight (LBW) [21, 23, 2730, 45, 47, 48, 50, 5356], preterm birth (PTB) [27, 29, 5355], small for gestational age (SGA) [53, 54] and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) [29, 55].…”
Section: Bibliographic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Bedouin-Arab population in Israel is characterized by a high rate of congenital malformations in comparison to the country's Jewish and Science of the Total Environment 517 (2015) [106][107][108][109][110][111][112] other Arab populations (Bentov et al, 2006). In southern Israel, the Bedouin-Arab population numbers around 200,000 inhabitants, most of who are of low socio-economic level owing to their high rate of unemployment and generally low education level (The Central Bureau of Statistics in Israel).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Since the publication of the Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States report, 13 the environmental justice (EJ) movement has drawn attention to the interplay of differential exposure to environmental hazards and social determinants on health outcomes with a wealth of literature demonstrating these relationships especially among EJ communities. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] For example, several studies have provided evidence for the role that environmental hazards and social determinants play in driving disparities in cardiovascular disease, 22,23 asthma, [24][25][26][27] congenital anomalies, [28][29][30][31][32] diabetes, 33,34 and infant mortality 35,36 in EJ communities. In spite of the established associations between environmental hazards and social determinants on these health outcomes, little work has been performed to examine similar relationships between these processes and infectious diseases in EJ communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%