2021
DOI: 10.1002/qj.4105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major surface melting over the Ross Ice Shelf part II: Surface energy balance

Abstract: The West Antarctic climate is under the combined impact of synoptic and regional drivers. Regional factors have contributed to more frequent surface melting with a similar pattern recently, which accelerates ice loss and favors global sea‐level rise. Part I of this research identified and quantified the two leading drivers of Ross Ice Shelf (RIS) melting, viz. foehn effect and direct marine air advection, based on Polar WRF (PWRF) simulations. In this article (Part II), the impact of clouds and the pattern of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias of surface temperature simulation from PWRF in WA is less than ∼1 • C, which is reduced by 2 • C compared with AMPS. Also, the surface wind and radiation from PWRF show more reliable results (Zou et al, 2021). Thus, the transport of heat and moisture from the ocean to the RIS can be described more precisely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The bias of surface temperature simulation from PWRF in WA is less than ∼1 • C, which is reduced by 2 • C compared with AMPS. Also, the surface wind and radiation from PWRF show more reliable results (Zou et al, 2021). Thus, the transport of heat and moisture from the ocean to the RIS can be described more precisely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…By contrast, the mountain waves over MRY are more turbulent with larger Fr numbers (Figure 6b heat transfer between foehn flow and the surface on the leeside. Also, the surface temperature on the leeside of MRY increased to ∼2 • C. However, when Fr is much larger than 1 (e.g., Fr = 2,000) or closer to infinity, the diminished turbulent mountain waves will not enhance the heat transfer and increase the surface temperature effectively (Zou et al, 2021). In general, the 2005 and 2016 cases experienced stronger surface warming on the leeside of mountains, and MRY had stronger mountain waves compared with MRX, including breaking waves and hydraulic jumps.…”
Section: Recurring Foehn Effectmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations