2020
DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2020.1738638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making America Safe Again: Public Support for Policies to Reduce Terrorism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These views matter. Research shows that perceiving immigrants as dangerous is a robust predictor of support for Trump's restrictive immigrant policies (e.g., the border wall, the Muslim ban; see Haner et al, 2020). Research also shows that a core factor contributing to White support for Trump in the 2016 election, including switching votes from Obama to Trump, was opposition to immigration (Jardina, 2019a;Kaufmann, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These views matter. Research shows that perceiving immigrants as dangerous is a robust predictor of support for Trump's restrictive immigrant policies (e.g., the border wall, the Muslim ban; see Haner et al, 2020). Research also shows that a core factor contributing to White support for Trump in the 2016 election, including switching votes from Obama to Trump, was opposition to immigration (Jardina, 2019a;Kaufmann, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research also shows that different forms of extremism can be assessed differently when it comes to the role that ideology and/or psychopathology play in them ( 25 29 ). Islamist-inspired extremism is likelier to be referred to as terrorism by security agencies, the media, and public opinion than violence inspired by right-wing or left-wing extremism ( 30 ).…”
Section: Academic Research On the Relationship Between Psychopathology And Violent Extremismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Islamist-inspired extremism is likelier to be referred to as terrorism by security agencies, the media, and public opinion than violence inspired by right-wing or left-wing extremism ( 30 ). Muslims are generally described more negatively by the media than other groups and likelier to be associated by the media with violent extremism than other groups with the risk that right-wing extremism is more likely to be interpreted as psychopathological ( 25 29 ). Studies also report that while Islamist-inspired extremist acts are more likely to be labeled as terrorism in the media, those who commit far-right-inspired extremist acts are not more likely to be labeled mentally ill than individuals from other ideological groups ( 30 ).…”
Section: Academic Research On the Relationship Between Psychopathology And Violent Extremismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, there has been new wave of anti-terrorism with laws, surveillances, migration policies, control on religious activities (propagation, knowledge, teachings, funding) as well as a 'mistaken perception' of Islam and Muslims and prejudices which make Islam and Muslims targets and victims of both terrorism and anti-terrorism (Haner, Sloan, Cullen, Graham, Jonson, Kulig&Aydın, 2020; Zouhir, 2019). Muslims and their states, especially the Arabs and Africans are being singled, excluded, victimised and systematically targeted by the US and the West, with policies against Muslims and immigrants which conflate Islam and terrorism (Stephenson & Becker, 2016;Onwudiwe, 2005:6;Haner, et. al., 2020).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%