2013
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making colorectal cancer screening FITTER for purpose with quantitative faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major issue is that gFOBTs have a subjective and evanescent end point not readable, let alone quantifiable, using automated instrumentation and therefore not suited to high-throughput screening programs. Professional quality assurance programs are minimal [ 29 ], and problems in variation in reading of gFOBT among laboratory staff have been well known for decades [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major issue is that gFOBTs have a subjective and evanescent end point not readable, let alone quantifiable, using automated instrumentation and therefore not suited to high-throughput screening programs. Professional quality assurance programs are minimal [ 29 ], and problems in variation in reading of gFOBT among laboratory staff have been well known for decades [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIT currently use different analytical materials, report results unique to the individual device and have no consensus method of measuring and reporting sample collection mass or test stability. To aid the difficult process of selecting a test kit and cut-off concentration appropriate to individual screening programmes the World Endoscopy Organization formed an Expert Working Group ‘FIT for Screening’ in 2011 to identify and promote standardisation of FIT [16], [20], [21], [33], [34], [35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, very few publications actually follow the EWG guidelines on standards for FIT evaluation reporting guidelines, namely the FITTER guidelines [21,22].…”
Section: The State Of the Art Of Faecal Haemoglobin Concentration Examentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Proposal 5: Such academic reports should follow the FITTER guidelines [21,22] and inform on examination performance characteristics achieved, particularly at or near the LoD.…”
Section: Proposals For Reporting F-hb Data At Low Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%