1993
DOI: 10.1145/163430.164050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making customer-centered design work for teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the cleverness of Contextual Design is that designing the user interface and its details are delayed as long as possible and it encourages thorough design change that goes beyond user interface changes (Spinuzzi, 2000). As Holzblatt and Beyer (1993) describe it by themselves: 'We could use prototypes, mockups, or sketches to represent system structure. But we find they focus the team on the user interface.…”
Section: Analysing User Needs and Discovering Relevant Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the cleverness of Contextual Design is that designing the user interface and its details are delayed as long as possible and it encourages thorough design change that goes beyond user interface changes (Spinuzzi, 2000). As Holzblatt and Beyer (1993) describe it by themselves: 'We could use prototypes, mockups, or sketches to represent system structure. But we find they focus the team on the user interface.…”
Section: Analysing User Needs and Discovering Relevant Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-method approach was therefore employed, which included contextual interviews, group discussions, questionnaires, workshops, lab experiments, observations, video screen capture of system usage, notes from discussions and documentary evidence (Carroll et al 2003a;Holtzblatt and Beyer 1993;Mendoza et al 2005). In addition, datacollection activities were structured in such a way as to identify the unfolding of people's appropriation choices over time; workshop participants' impressions or evaluations of the AKD prototype were captured after a short presentation, which also entailed the presentation of other KMS to serve as points of comparison (level-one evaluation; refer to mTAC, Figure 6.1), as well as during and after having an opportunity to explore and use the technology to support various tasks (level-two evaluation).…”
Section: Figure 63 the Retina Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the database is to be truly usable, its interfaces must respond to the requirements of different user profiles. This evidenced by the fact that software users are no longer willing to put up with products that are difficult to learn or use [9]. Simply creating an elegant, powerful scientific database doesn't mean that it will be used.…”
Section: Why "Split Personalities" Are Neededmentioning
confidence: 99%