2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-65384-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Neural Networks FAIR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the efforts in hardware information modeling, very few [11] have addressed the modeling of the software stack, especially ML models, in the context of IoT. An existing ontology [32] describes NN models but lacks hardware-specific information. We have proposed a semantic ontology [42] tailored for NN models in IoT scenarios, with hardware specifications in mind, such as resource and platform requirements.…”
Section: Semantic Web Technology For Information Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the efforts in hardware information modeling, very few [11] have addressed the modeling of the software stack, especially ML models, in the context of IoT. An existing ontology [32] describes NN models but lacks hardware-specific information. We have proposed a semantic ontology [42] tailored for NN models in IoT scenarios, with hardware specifications in mind, such as resource and platform requirements.…”
Section: Semantic Web Technology For Information Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, authors in [31] described a database for tracking ML models. A KG called FAIRnets [17] collects information about publicly available neural networks and makes them exchangeable. Although all methods mentioned above provide certain degrees of expressiveness about ML models, they fall short in TinyML.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we design the vocabulary for on-device applications based on S3N. There is also an ontology that describes neural network models [45]. However, this ontology (1) includes much unnecessary and redundant information relating to the optimizer, cost function, training dataset, and organization; (2) does not include information about the weights of the model, which renders its redeployment impossible; (3) is not suitable for the IoT environment, as it does not provide IoT/edge-speciic information, for example, memory requirements, and quantization; (4) is not designed for ONNX [19], an open exchange format proposed to bridge diferent ecosystems with a common representation of NN model, and to help reduce interoperability in future developments.…”
Section: Semantic Web Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%