2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.12.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the Case for Early Medical Student Education in Interventional Radiology: A Survey of 2nd-year Students in a Single U.S. Institution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a survey of 64 second-year medical students at a single U.S. institution after an 1-hour, case-based introductory interventional radiology lecture, 29% said their impressions of and interest in the practice of Interventional Radiology had significantly improved and 46% had a better impression [19].…”
Section: Medical Students Especially Those In Preclerkship Want Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a survey of 64 second-year medical students at a single U.S. institution after an 1-hour, case-based introductory interventional radiology lecture, 29% said their impressions of and interest in the practice of Interventional Radiology had significantly improved and 46% had a better impression [19].…”
Section: Medical Students Especially Those In Preclerkship Want Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the parameters assessed, 12 studies were classified as “high risk” for internal validity [[6], [7], [8], [9], [10],[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]] and 5 as “low risk” [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23]]. Sixteen studies used a representative population of undergraduate students and were therefore considered as low risk for external validity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies reported performance improvement in the form of structured skills-based assessments or knowledge-based questionnaires on understanding of the speciality [16, [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]]. Six studies assessed the knowledge of students through randomly distributed questionnaires [6,9,10,14,15,18]; another six with questionnaires distributed after learning modules [16,[19], [20], [21], [22], [23]]. Five of the former studies mentioned used a pre and post-intervention survey to test for improvement after the relevant learning modules [16,[19], [20], [21], [22]].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations