2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2016.7757614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the connection: Successful cross campus collaboration among students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have looked at different methods of team creation, including random creation [2], separating students into groups and selecting one member from each group [21], and allowing self-created teams [29]. Each of these resulted in teams that underperformed, either because of single student was doing all the work, personality conflicts, or the demoralizing of students due to not being picked.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have looked at different methods of team creation, including random creation [2], separating students into groups and selecting one member from each group [21], and allowing self-created teams [29]. Each of these resulted in teams that underperformed, either because of single student was doing all the work, personality conflicts, or the demoralizing of students due to not being picked.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [35] and used bubble plots to combine and compare the different facets that were [15] Empirical Study Philosophical Paper Model Teaching 9.5 Järvi (2015) [22] Case Study Evaluation Research Lessons Learned Teaching 9.5 Schilling (2010) [42] Case Study Evaluation Research Guidelines Teaching 9.5 Zaina (2015) [47] Case Study Evaluation Research Framework/Method Teaching 9.0 Currie (2011) [10] Case Study Experience Paper Framework/Method Real Projects 9.0 Chesney (2014) [9] Case Study Evaluation Research Guidelines Real Projects 9.0 Izurieta (2016) [21] Case Study Experience Paper Framework/Method Real Projects 9.0 Zhang (2015) [48] Experiment Solution Proposal Model Teaching 8.5 de Lange (2016) [12] Case Study Validation Research Framework/Method Environment 8.5 Joseph (2006) [23] Case Study Evaluation Research Lessons Learned Multidiscipline 8.5 Daimi (2008) [11] Empirical Study Solution Proposal Guidelines Teaching 8.5 Chenoweth (2008) [8] Survey Experience Paper Guidelines Teaching 8.0 Ribeiro (2016) [37] Case Study Experience Paper Lessons Learned Environment 8.0 McMahon (2014) [28] Case Study Experience Paper Lessons Learned Teaching 8.0 Vitolo (2016) [45] Experiment Evaluation Research Lessons Learned Multidiscipline 8.0 Kaltenecker (2013) [25] Empirical Study Philosophical Paper Lessons Learned Teaching 8.0 Buffardi (2017) [7] Case Study Solution Proposal Framework/Method Multidiscipline 7.5 Porter (2015) [36] Case Study Solution Proposal Lessons Learned Multidiscipline 7.5 Bharadwaj (2014) [2] Experiment Experience Paper Framework/Method Teaching 7.5 Nguyen-Duc (2016) [30] Case Study Evaluation Research Model Teaching 7.5 Breytenbach (2013) [5] Case Study Experience Paper Lessons Learned Environment 7.5 Pauca (2012) [33] Case Study Solution Proposal Framework/Method Real Projects 6.5 Heintz(2014) [20] Case Study Experience Paper Lessons Learned Teaching 6.5 Ford (2004) [14] Case Study Experience Paper Lessons Learned Multidiscipline 6.5 Barbe (2010) ...…”
Section: Results Of the Systematic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%