1994
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00046561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the most of radiocarbon dating: some statistical considerations

Abstract: The revised radiocarbon calibration curve, published last year, extends back into the Pleistocene the radiocarbon determinations that can be converted to real calendar years. For determinations of any age, the right judgements and statistical considerations must be followed if the real information held in the determinations is to be found. Here is advice with some worked examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Points where radiocarbon sample measurements intersect the calibration curve a number of times (Pearson et al, 1986), or where the slope of the calibration curve is almost at, can be readily identi ed. In problem areas, even a high-precision radiocarbon measurement may represent a considerable period of time, or even more than one time interval, on the calendrical scale (Buck et al, 1994), due to the 'elastic' nature of 14 C time (Taylor et al, 1996). Clearly, in these instances, the precision of the calendar age assignment is low, but unless one selects new samples which fall outside the calibration plateaux or 'time warps', sensu Taylor et al (1996), there is little one can do to remedy this.…”
Section: Wiggle-match Datinghigh-precision Chronologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Points where radiocarbon sample measurements intersect the calibration curve a number of times (Pearson et al, 1986), or where the slope of the calibration curve is almost at, can be readily identi ed. In problem areas, even a high-precision radiocarbon measurement may represent a considerable period of time, or even more than one time interval, on the calendrical scale (Buck et al, 1994), due to the 'elastic' nature of 14 C time (Taylor et al, 1996). Clearly, in these instances, the precision of the calendar age assignment is low, but unless one selects new samples which fall outside the calibration plateaux or 'time warps', sensu Taylor et al (1996), there is little one can do to remedy this.…”
Section: Wiggle-match Datinghigh-precision Chronologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When OxCal was first released (1/8/1994, see Bronk Ramsey 1994, 1995 it provided, in addition to straight-forward calibration, various techniques for the analysis of groups of radiocarbon events in phases, sequences and (based largely on the work of Buck et al 1991Buck et al , 1992Buck et al , 1994. New techniques were also provided to test the internal consistency of these Models based on "agreement indices" (Bronk Ramsey 1995), which are, in effect pseudo Bayes factors (see for example chapter 9 of Gilks et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In archaeological literature this problem has been recognized only relatively recently, that is when scholars started working with large sets radiocarbon determinations rather than just a few dates as has been the case in the past (Buck et al, 1994(Buck et al, , 1996Ramsey, 2009aRamsey, , 2009b. One way to correct for stochastic effects is via Bayesian statistics, an approach that results in time intervals that are usually much shorter relative to what raw or calibrated dates indicate prior to statistical processing.…”
Section: Empirical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, large series of dates allow identification of temporal variation and patterns in the data that are otherwise invisible or obliterated by typological dating (e.g., the Baikal region providing a classic example of such confusion; Weber, 1995;Weber et al, 2010b). Third, they make it possible to employ quantitative methods (Buck et al, 1994(Buck et al, , 1996Ramsey, 2009aRamsey, , 2009b to measure the impact of stochastic effects on the distribution of radiocarbon dates which, in turn and among other things, allows improved assessment of the tempo of culture change. Fourth, better chronological resolution facilitates matching of archaeological and paleoenvironmental sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%