2020
DOI: 10.37536/fitispos-ij.2020.7.1.244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the Most of Retrospective Process Tracing in Dialogue Interpreting Research

Abstract: Retrospective verbal process tracing is a popular research method in Interpreting Studies, employed by a growing number of scholars, particularly in studies of conference interpreting, but, to date, it has not been widely employed in studies of dialogue interpreting. This paper begins by introducing process-tracing methodologies, defining types of verbal process tracing, and presenting a brief critical review of publications employing this research methodology. The bulk of the article provides concrete, practi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is also inspired by studies employing post-task interviews using retrospective process tracing methods (see Herring, 2019), which have been mostly used in the field of conference interpreting and much less in PSI (see Herring & Tiselius, 2020, for a thorough examination of these methods and what they entail). Therefore, an interview (see Appendix 2), which followed the same protocol consistently across participants with a scripted set of instructions, was held with the participants immediately after the simulations.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is also inspired by studies employing post-task interviews using retrospective process tracing methods (see Herring, 2019), which have been mostly used in the field of conference interpreting and much less in PSI (see Herring & Tiselius, 2020, for a thorough examination of these methods and what they entail). Therefore, an interview (see Appendix 2), which followed the same protocol consistently across participants with a scripted set of instructions, was held with the participants immediately after the simulations.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%