Making the students pay? The gross cost of property tax abatement for U.S. school districts

Wen, Christine; LeRoy, Greg

doi:10.1080/15575330.2022.2148171

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…77 signifies, limits and challenges abound. First, the high administrative costs for the state in overseeing local compliance, standardization, and quality resulted in large variations in the rigor and usefulness of the data among states, regions, districts, and even accounting firms (Fischer & Holmes, 2018; Wen & LeRoy, 2022). Second, not all reporting entities use GASB's accounting standards (e.g., Indiana and some parts of Kansas).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Economic Development Tax Abatements Affect School Finances?

Wen

2023

Economic Development Quarterly

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Criticisms against tax incentives typically come from either the regional inequality perspective that compares a locality with others in terms of the amount of revenues foregone or the opportunity cost perspective that compares a locality with itself in an alternate reality where it foregoes less or none. How foregone/hypothetical revenues affect collected/actual revenues and related fiscal outcomes is less understood. This article examines the association between the amount of abated taxes and school district revenues and expenditures in 2019 for the nine U.S. states that have sufficient tax abatement data for such analyses. Findings show that districts experiencing greater incentive cost burden have fewer overall revenues per pupil, depend more on local sources besides property tax, spend less on teaching salaries, and are more likely to be underfunded. Some of these effects vary by district wealth, suggesting the need to fine-tune the incentive award levels according to local conditions.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%